Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumCandidates Reagan & Bush-41 Discuss Illegal Immigration in 1980 Debate
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1482 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Candidates Reagan & Bush-41 Discuss Illegal Immigration in 1980 Debate (Original Post)
Pryderi
Feb 2013
OP
demwing
(16,916 posts)1. Holy cow, both sounded down right progressive!
But Bush sounded like he felt passionate about the issue. What the hell happened to the Republican party?
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)3. Bush always put a positive spin on his rhetoric...
You remember him wanting a kinder, gentler America.
Bucky
(54,014 posts)2. Both wanted to solve the problem. But you gotta love Reagan's "grasp" of the facts.
Mexico had severe problems in 1980. But the unemployment rate was at 20%, not the revolution-inducing 40-50% that Bonzo just pulled out of his pompadour.
Of course they were running for the nomination of a party that was about evenly split on the question of whether a woman has control over her own body.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)4. Wow they sound sane and rational.
Pryderi
(6,772 posts)5. Yep. The production value was low, level of debate high. nt