Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 04:30 PM Jan 2021

These Are the Highest Resolution Photos Ever Taken of Snowflakes

Photographer and scientist Nathan Myhrvold has developed a camera that captures snowflakes at a microscopic level never seen before.

Myhrvold, who holds a PhD in theoretical mathematics and physics from Princeton University and served as the Chief Technology Officer at Microsoft for 14 years, leaned on his background as a scientist to create the camera. He also tapped into his experience as a photographer ... Myhrvold first got the idea to photograph snowflakes 15 years ago after meeting Kenneth Libbrecht, a California Institute of Technology professor who happened to be studying the physics of snowflakes.







full article at https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/these-are-highest-resolution-photos-ever-taken-snowflakes-180976710/

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These Are the Highest Resolution Photos Ever Taken of Snowflakes (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Jan 2021 OP
Looks like Dr. Emoto's "Water Project" pix! SheltieLover Jan 2021 #1
You know that Emoto is a fraud. Earthshine2 Jan 2021 #6
NIH article seems to disagree SheltieLover Jan 2021 #8
They offered him a million dollars to do reproduce his work as seen in "The Secret." He can't! Earthshine2 Jan 2021 #9
Nope. SheltieLover Jan 2021 #10
Repeating this nonsense doesn't make Emoto's work true. Earthshine2 Jan 2021 #12
Lol SheltieLover Jan 2021 #14
Facts vs. faith You are welcome to believe that Emoto's work is true. Earthshine2 Jan 2021 #16
Would you give credence to work done by the Dean of Princeton's Dept. of Engineering? TheRickles Jan 2021 #29
and I thought this post was a simple admiration of some beautiful, high res pics of snowflakes.... Chakaconcarne Jan 2021 #23
That's his own article. TwilightZone Jan 2021 #28
Comment #29 has some info you might be interested in. TheRickles Jan 2021 #32
Not what I expecetd luv2fly Jan 2021 #2
100% this, beat me to it. nt kirkuchiyo Jan 2021 #7
Ha, me too! The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2021 #11
Me three! OMGWTF Jan 2021 #26
My first thought, as well. niyad Jan 2021 #21
Cool (pardon the pun) soothsayer Jan 2021 #3
Amazing...each one is a work of art. CatMor Jan 2021 #4
WOW! And they're always symmetrical too... AmyStrange Jan 2021 #5
Sort of kurtcagle Jan 2021 #13
blah blah blah AmyStrange Jan 2021 #15
Good one. Made me laugh. Better than the eight part disagreement going on above. Or, to quote.... EarnestPutz Jan 2021 #17
Good question. AmyStrange Jan 2021 #18
Lol! calimary Jan 2021 #25
Water Memory - for the water wonks. OhNo-Really Jan 2021 #19
They are SO beautiful! ananda Jan 2021 #20
Hey, I got the Biden rec (46)! hay rick Jan 2021 #22
Lol! calimary Jan 2021 #24
new flag? RicROC Jan 2021 #27
reminds me of something. IcyPeas Jan 2021 #30
Came in here expecting... Stand and Fight Jan 2021 #31
 

Earthshine2

(4,044 posts)
9. They offered him a million dollars to do reproduce his work as seen in "The Secret." He can't!
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 04:53 PM
Jan 2021

"I also personally do not take lack of evidence to equate to evidence of lack. "

These words do not substantiate anything. You seem to be trying to prove a negative by virtue of its own nonexistence.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

 

Earthshine2

(4,044 posts)
12. Repeating this nonsense doesn't make Emoto's work true.
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 04:57 PM
Jan 2021

You actually cited Emoto's own article as evidence of proof of his work.

This conversation must end now. Please do not reply.

 

Earthshine2

(4,044 posts)
16. Facts vs. faith You are welcome to believe that Emoto's work is true.
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 05:52 PM
Jan 2021

Seems there's only one article in support of his work -- his own.

Did you click your own link? There's actually no article there. Just an abstract. The data has been removed.

A google search on "Emoto fraud" turns up many links.

From wikipedia ...

Writing about Emoto's ideas in the Skeptical Inquirer, physician Harriet A. Hall concluded that it was "hard to see how anyone could mistake it for science".[5] Emoto was personally invited to take the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge by James Randi in 2003 and would have received US$1,000,000 if he had been able to reproduce the experiment under test conditions agreed to by both parties. Emoto did not accept the invitation.[19][20]


Again, you are welcome to believe that Emoto's work is true.

So, why am I bothering with this? There was a time when I wanted to believe that emotional energy could affect physical reality at a distance, such as is shown in What the Bleep?

But, ultimately, sadly, that belief didn't stand up to intellectual rigor.

TheRickles

(2,068 posts)
29. Would you give credence to work done by the Dean of Princeton's Dept. of Engineering?
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 07:39 PM
Jan 2021

If so, you might want to look into the work done by Dr. Robert Jahn and his Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) lab over the past 40 years. They demonstrated exactly what you dismissed - emotional energy can affect physical reality at a distance. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17560342/

And Wikipedia has a well-known bias against holistic therapies and approaches that purport to use invisible healing energies, regardless of what the science may show: https://www.wbur.org/commonhealth/2014/11/28/harvard-doc-to-wikipedia-youre-not-playing-fair-on-alternative-trauma-therapy

Chakaconcarne

(2,457 posts)
23. and I thought this post was a simple admiration of some beautiful, high res pics of snowflakes....
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 06:58 PM
Jan 2021


Thanks for sharing.

TheRickles

(2,068 posts)
32. Comment #29 has some info you might be interested in.
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 10:39 AM
Jan 2021

Scientific validation from Princeton of the concept that mind can influence matter (apart from whatever Emoto did or did not demonstrate - and the study you cited here is a good one, too).

 

AmyStrange

(7,989 posts)
5. WOW! And they're always symmetrical too...
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 04:36 PM
Jan 2021

Last edited Thu Jan 28, 2021, 06:36 PM - Edit history (1)

-

Nature just blows me the freak away!


Thanks for posting.
==========

kurtcagle

(1,604 posts)
13. Sort of
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 04:58 PM
Jan 2021

Snowflakes have rotational symmetry - if you rotate a snowflake through 60 degrees, the image will be the same. However, because snowflakes do rotate in the air as they freeze, there is a slight tug along the direction of rotation that can make them mirror asymmetric. No less beautiful, of course, and if anything even more mathematically intriguing.

EarnestPutz

(2,120 posts)
17. Good one. Made me laugh. Better than the eight part disagreement going on above. Or, to quote....
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 06:33 PM
Jan 2021

.....Rodney King: "Can't we all get along?"

calimary

(81,338 posts)
25. Lol!
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 07:12 PM
Jan 2021

Great thread!

Both almost impossibly magnificent gorgeousness, and mirth, DU-style!

Those snowflake photos are astounding! Nothing short of MAGICAL!

RicROC

(1,204 posts)
27. new flag?
Thu Jan 28, 2021, 07:16 PM
Jan 2021

I like the first photo- it could be used for a new flag. It would fit in any western New York State city.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
31. Came in here expecting...
Fri Jan 29, 2021, 06:39 AM
Jan 2021

Came in here expecting pictures of Trump supporters in tears and on copium. I leave equally relieved and disappointed.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»These Are the Highest Res...