Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsWhen is a tuna sub not a tuna sub? AT SUBWAY
A lab test set up by the New York Times reportedly detected no tuna DNA in 60 inches of tuna sandwiches that were examined. The experiment included sandwiches from three Subway shops in Los Angeles. Of course, theres a catch.
According to a spokesperson from the unidentified lab that conducted the testing, there are two possibilities for their inability to detect tuna. The first explanation is that Subways tuna is so heavily processed that if there is tuna in their sandwiches, it couldnt be clearly identified. The second possibility is that theres no tuna.
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-subway-sandwich-no-tuna-dna-20210622-dqx3rqniezcg7m2qhf44bugypm-story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 645 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When is a tuna sub not a tuna sub? AT SUBWAY (Original Post)
packman
Jun 2021
OP
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)1. Has anyone seen Jared?
Siwsan
(26,263 posts)4. I'm guessing his cell mate has, if he has one.
I got to wondering so I checked. He's not eligible for parole until 2029!
LakeArenal
(28,819 posts)2. Just ate on two days ago. I enjoyed it.
LakeArenal
(28,819 posts)3. Just ate on two days ago. I enjoyed it.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)7. the story is bullshit anyway
Canned tuna is sterilized at high temperatures. That's why it's that light tan color instead of pink. That and ingredients used to make tuna salad destroys the DNA.
LakeArenal
(28,819 posts)8. Thanks. Here in Costa Rica there are no sub shops
I miss them. I can have a Subway sub about once every six weeks when we go into the city for shopping.
DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts)5. I haven't touched tuna salad/sandwiches since I was a kid.
The only tuna on a sandwich I want these days is a grilled ahi or ono steak.
Or if/when I get to Hawaii, a poke bowl of it.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)6. When is bullshit bullshit? When it's the NY Daily News
All canned tuna is sterilized at high temperature, which damages the DNA beyond detection.
This is a bullshit piece of "news" intended for ignorant people.
Next up - someone tries to get cattle DNA from a cooked hamburger. That's not going to work either.
https://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/612
"Authentication of tuna fish products is necessary to assure consumers of accurate labelling of food products. The quality of species specific DNA crucially affects the efficiency of amplification during the subsequent PCR. The problem in DNA detection in canned products lies in the possibility of the fragmentation of DNA during the processing technologies and the use of ingredients (oil, salt, spice), that may inhibit the PCR reaction."