The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsNothing against tattoos, and it's none of my business....
I got one myself in 1993, the Morrigan, pagan Irish Goddess of war (aka "the phantom queen) on my arm. It hasn't aged well (neither have I ), but sleeves cover it so no big deal.
I know a woman in her 30's, of Spanish descent, stunning with some of the most beautiful light olive skin I have ever seen.
Recently, she posted fb pics of some really bad tattoo work, covering very large swaths of her body. (Very bright red and white birds full length torso, and huge football team logo, ffs.)
She also expressed some anti vaxer/pro Trump talking points to me, completely out of character for her, as she was completely apolitical before. I wondered where this came from, the tat shop is on my route that I drive daily taking clients to appointments. Looked at it last week and noticed the Trump sign in the window.
Again, I realize no one told me what I could or could not get tattooed on my body, and I have absolutely no right to tell anyone else the same.
I am, however, allowed to have an opinion on art, which is what ink is at it's highest levels.
What I saw was a drooling idiot scribbling bathroom wall obscenities on a Rembrandt.
Thank you, I feel better now.
.
brewens
(13,575 posts)orangecrush
(19,543 posts)I kept that in mind when getting mine on the upper arm, and not excessively large.
NBachers
(17,107 posts)orangecrush
(19,543 posts)And tasteful.
This was neither.
That said, I have seen ink that is literally living art.
Few and far between.
MontanaMama
(23,308 posts)A Celtic triquetra. I love it and glad I did it. The Morrigan is badass.
orangecrush
(19,543 posts)Of appearing in disguise, being a shape shifter.
Kind of like, "Wow! I'm lying with a beautiful woman! Oh wait... why am I levitating off the bed?"
Happy St. Parricks Day, in advance!
ret5hd
(20,491 posts)Agree with everything youve said, but I have never seen one that makes the person look better. Ive seen great tattoos and bad tattoos, but my personal opinion, no matter how good they are, is no matter how great a job an artist did man, sorry you looked better without it. Youd have been better off paying the artist to do it on canvas and hang it somewhere.
orangecrush
(19,543 posts)Having pagan Celtic ancestors.
It's an ancient practice, with spiritual meaning if properly done.
But yeah, I would not do it again, and in the case of the op, it was enough to make you cry.
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)and only military and convicts got them. My poor parents were stunned but helpless, and I wasn't that thrilled either.
The funny part was when I was waiting my turn to get one, and a kid burst in to the front desk and was furious with his result, yelling that it was supposed to be the head of a jaguar and he showed it to be looking like a possum! And the dude who did it (they weren't called "artists" back then) was just flustered and, like, nothing could be done.
I was about to do the cartoon leg stretching out the door.
**** When the tattoo thing took off with non-military/convicts and entire bodies got to be covered over mostly with unsightly and poorly arranged results, yeah, I agree with the O.P. But then, tastefulness was not a leading characteristic.
orangecrush
(19,543 posts)For the great story!
And yeah, mine was pure testosterone, in the middle of my martial arts years.
Maraya1969
(22,478 posts)starts to sag and the pretty or not so pretty pictures start sagging right along.
I only have my eyebrows and eyeliner. The only thing they do is fade.
orangecrush
(19,543 posts)Get them touched up.
Never did mine, since it's hidden.