The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsI thought Trump had a limited vocabulary. He has competition.
Last night, I was watching the Paralympics snowboarding competition. One of the 2 commentators was past Olympian Amy Purdy. She may be a good snowboarder, but her vocabulary needs some work. A lot of work.
The whole show, the ONLY adjective she used was "incredible" - over, and over, and over. Sometimes twice in the same sentence. It was a combination of irritating, laughable, and pathetic.
At the very end of the broadcast, she did describe one race as "tight," and also used "fantastic."
I'd like to send her a list of alternatives.
EYESORE 9001
(25,921 posts)They are responsible for more ambiguity than any other part of speech.
leftieNanner
(15,078 posts)Pop a Roget's Thesaurus in the mail?
I've always thought that sports announcers would have nothing to say if you removed the word "situation" from the English language.
underpants
(182,733 posts)&ct=g
&ct=g
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)Aristus
(66,308 posts)"Jew see hee-im kitch 'at bawl?"
rownesheck
(2,343 posts)use "differential" as in "point differential". Shouldn't it be "difference"? Maybe I'm wrong. I don't know.
3catwoman3
(23,968 posts)...where teams rank within their league, and is abbreviated GD in the charts. It refers to the total number of goals scored by a team compared with the total number of goals scored against them for the whole season. I don't hear it used when discussing the score in individual games.
I can't speak to any other sports.
A word I have come to detest is impactful. It sounds clumsy and pretentious. There is nothing wrong with influential, which I think sounds more sophisticated.