Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1862 Mousetrap -definitely different (Original Post) packman Mar 2022 OP
Decidedly. dchill Mar 2022 #1
These things were just booby traps. Calling them mouse traps was just cover. Chainfire Mar 2022 #2
Do you have a photo of an 1862 mouse? Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #3

Chainfire

(17,530 posts)
2. These things were just booby traps. Calling them mouse traps was just cover.
Sat Mar 19, 2022, 12:52 PM
Mar 2022

A hair trigger on an easily concealable single shot non-firearm firearm. Because they used black powder instead of modern powder they were not regulated as "firearms." If you watched the video, the poster admitted that mice could run all over it without triggering the device, though larger animals could trigger it.

Back in the 90s a lot of folks were illegally altering some semi-auto weapons to fire automatically by drilling a hole in the receiver and being able to readily insert and remove a device to make the magazine empty with a single pull of the trigger. The called the alteration to the receiver an "oil hole." Of course, it fooled the BATFE for about 15 seconds...

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»1862 Mousetrap -definitel...