The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsOld movies that couldn't be remade today because of *taboo* subject matter
I started a thread about Dirty Dancing, which was released 25 years ago today.
I keep reading rumors about a remake of the movie but they could never redo the original. Part of the storyline revolves around an unwanted pregnancy and trying to get the girl an abortion, which at the time was illegal.
You remove that part of the storyline the rest of the movie doesn't make sense. Johnny (Patrick Swazye) was seen as the low-life dance instructor that wasn't good enough for any of Dr. Houseman's daughter. The Ayn Rand, Harvard-attending, Paul Ryan-wannabe waiter was seen as the perfect catch for any girl. In the end Johnny was the good guy and the waiter turned out to be a real douchebag.
It's odd that during the Reagan administration somehow a movie that had an abortion as part of the storyline was a sleeper hit of the summer and a favorite with young girls & adults. But the way politics are today, they could never remake a movie like that unless they took out that major plotline. And then it would just be a schlocky movie with some dancing in it instead of a movie about the social injustices out there.
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)Bertha Venation
(21,484 posts)ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)sadbear
(4,340 posts)you can't even see it today: Disney's Song of the South.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)with similar content - and some even more egregious - can be seen on YouTube.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I've only ever seen 'All this and Rabbit Stew' and what's interesting it's basically a Bugs Bunny vs. Elmer Fudd except Elmer Fudd is now an African American in post civil war times. He's even drawn like Elmer Fudd and many of the things he does in the cartoon Elmer Fudd has done in other Bugs Bunny Cartoons. But it still just comes across racist the way they voiced the character.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)An animation freak who was a friend of a friend was selling them years ago at local comic shops.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)There are people right here at DU who would have a shitfit and fall in it if it were remade, Nabokov or no.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Good movie. It was remade in 1997, as a foreign film, I think. I didn't see that version.
James Mason in the older version....that was one of his best performances, IMO.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)critics damned it, but I thought it was a good remake...
deutsey
(20,166 posts)Broken_Hero
(59,305 posts)AnneD
(15,774 posts)If you are going to walkup to the bell, you may as well ring it. He almost didn't get it by the censors at the time.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)Also deals with the possibility of an abortion.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)Come to think of it, Russell Edgington would add a lot to a cotillion.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)Using the slaves to feed their bloodlust? The entire Union Army would be armed with wooden stakes and silver bullets. Rhett Butler is still the opportunistic profiteer who gets drawn into the Southern cause by a woman he lusts after, but with the added quirk that she has turned him into a vampire, too.
This could be more fun than "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies"!
Call it "Gone with the Dawn" since the Confederates can only fight at night.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)She already is published in the vampire genre. I really have no interest or talent to produce a work based on the idea.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)My friend usually has more ideas than she can use. I mostly act as one of her 'expert' consultants, answering questions about horses. If it comes to mind the next time I talk to her I might mention this idea to her, but by then it may have slipped my mind.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Children gambling, drinking and smoking just won't do.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Just saying.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)After all, an incest victim could not POSSIBLY get pregnant.
trof
(54,256 posts)I thought it was delightful, and can still sing 'Zippity Doo Dah', which won the Academy Award as best song of 1947. It has been perceived as racist by some (including the NAACP), although I don't agree.
Uncle Remus was a loveable and very moral character.
However, you can't find it on tape or DVD.
From wiki:
The setting of the film is the deep South of the Reconstruction era. Harris' original Uncle Remus stories were all set after the American Civil War and the abolition of slavery (Harris himself, born in 1845, was a racial reconciliation activist writer and journalist of the Reconstruction era). The film makes several indirect references to the Reconstruction era: clothing is in the newer late-Victorian style; Uncle Remus is free to leave the plantation at will; black field hands are sharecroppers, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Song_of_the_South
trof
(54,256 posts)Decide for yourself.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)did not know that!
hlthe2b
(102,297 posts)Thanks for that link.
WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)The screaming would never stop if that movie was made today.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)the Afghanistan mujahideen arent cool anymore the way they were in the Reagan years.
hlthe2b
(102,297 posts)and the character of the abortionist Doctor, though flawed, was somewhat of a hero figure in the movie...
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I think in the end he did one because of incest but that was one of the reasons he left the orphanage.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)They drank beer and champagne!!
Paladin
(28,265 posts)This is where we're at: A 1950's soap opera movie depicts a doctor's administration of an abortion, due to a drunken stepfather's rape---no way in hell would a modern-day studio allow it. If you're not scared by how far this country's slipped, you're not paying attention......
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)and show how wonderful it is to raise the child your birthed because of a drunken rape by your stepfather.
seriously!
Tabasco_Dave
(1,259 posts)Theaters refused to show this movie because of violence concerns, you had to catch it on cable if you where lucky to have it. I doubt they would make it today.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I remembered wondering why the kids in the 70s had so ass-kicking much fun while my time in the late 80s/early 90s was mired in suck...
YankeyMCC
(8,401 posts)but I'm not so sure actually, certainly things have changed (I hope!) but maybe not so much that something like this film could not still be made relevant.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Same thing except this was about the story of a white man who made himself black and traveled throughout the south during the 60s.
BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)1943 movie about Soviet heroism against the Nazis (unfairly panned by modern day Americans as ww2 propaganda)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036217/