Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trof

(54,256 posts)
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 06:05 PM Aug 2012

Could we retire the word "actually"?

If you make a declarative statement about something you witnessed, why does it have to be prefaced by "actually".? If you saw it or experienced it, and you're telling me about it, I just assume that it "actually" happened.
Either that or you're a damned liar.

I notice this more and more in everyday conversation and also on CNN.
It's getting worse than "like".
"So like we went to Hardee's? And they were like out of curly fries? And I said like What's up with THAT?"


32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could we retire the word "actually"? (Original Post) trof Aug 2012 OP
Actually, we can not. Liberal Veteran Aug 2012 #1
Beat me to the punch. MichaelSoE Aug 2012 #2
Me, too pinboy3niner Aug 2012 #7
Like why not, actually? trof Aug 2012 #3
Of you really are determined to insist on an answer (actually)... pinboy3niner Aug 2012 #8
Totally stole my answer as well Amaril Sep 2012 #21
At the end of the day, does it actually matter? bluesbassman Aug 2012 #4
It's hopeless. trof Aug 2012 #5
are you actually talking about me? Kali Aug 2012 #6
Actually, no. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #9
Actually, I think really is a bigger problem word. Really. reformist2 Sep 2012 #10
"Really?" trof Sep 2012 #11
Actually, really. kwassa Sep 2012 #12
That's why I spell it, "rilly?" Baitball Blogger Sep 2012 #23
Guilty as charged derby378 Sep 2012 #13
Hopefully. lastlib Sep 2012 #14
Jeez, who let the Actually Hater into the Lounge. bigwillq Sep 2012 #15
We'd have some explaining to do 7wo7rees Sep 2012 #16
Actually, someone who suggests that should be forced to buy dinner for madinmaryland Sep 2012 #17
Actually, no. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #18
while we are at it can we lose the phrase rbrnmw Sep 2012 #19
Exactly! reformist2 Sep 2012 #24
You actually went to Hardee's for curly fries?? retread Sep 2012 #20
How about veritably? Major Nikon Sep 2012 #22
Actually, maybe you shouldn't let people know what bugs you. alphafemale Sep 2012 #25
I use it to correct misconceptions or falsehoods lunatica Sep 2012 #26
Bottom line: No. JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2012 #27
only if "Anyways" can go too! cleanhippie Sep 2012 #28
In fact, in reality, at this time, at present, as a matter of fact, really, in truth, kentauros Sep 2012 #29
OK, also "The FACT of the matter is..." trof Sep 2012 #30
I can ignore that one more than kentauros Sep 2012 #31
In most cases no... yawnmaster Sep 2012 #32

derby378

(30,252 posts)
13. Guilty as charged
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 09:07 PM
Sep 2012

I feel the same way about people who begin and end every sentence with "so."

Case in point: "So I'm at the grocery store, and I'm getting some guacamole dip for home, and it just went up a dime over the past week, so..."

And there's nothing after the last "so." It just stops there. Why?

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
22. How about veritably?
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 12:34 PM
Sep 2012

Or...

Naturally

Certainly

Positively

Doubtlessly

Surely

Truly

Undeniably

Strictly speaking

In actuality

In truth

As a mater of fact

In point of fact

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
25. Actually, maybe you shouldn't let people know what bugs you.
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 03:54 PM
Sep 2012

Because, actually there are some annoying shits here on DU who will never let you alone now.

heh

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,350 posts)
27. Bottom line: No.
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 04:56 PM
Sep 2012

Actually, we could like stop using it, but really we won't stop. Even if we like think outside the box.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
29. In fact, in reality, at this time, at present, as a matter of fact, really, in truth,
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 07:18 PM
Sep 2012

no.

actually (adv.)
early 15c., "in fact, in reality" (as opposed to in possibility), from actual + -ly (2). Meaning "actively, vigorously" is from mid-15c.; that of "at this time, at present" is from 1660s. As an intensive added to a statement and suggesting "as a matter of fact, really, in truth" it is attested from 1762.

trof

(54,256 posts)
30. OK, also "The FACT of the matter is..."
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:23 PM
Sep 2012

Anytime I hear a politician say this I KNOW that whatever follows is a lie.

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
32. In most cases no...
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:03 PM
Sep 2012

it has a use.
it can express some disbelief...as in "it actually happened!".
or it can express sarcasm as in... "actually, you are wrong".
etc.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Could we retire the word ...