The DU Lounge

orangecrush

(27,209 posts) Thu Aug 14, 2025, 03:49 PM Aug 14

Sounds like an inefficient way to put out a fire (NSFW)

This was an actual ad, btw

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sounds like an inefficient way to put out a fire (NSFW) (Original Post) orangecrush Aug 14 OP

Five-alarm inappropriateness! True Dough Aug 14 #1

What ever do you mean? orangecrush Aug 14 #4

Someone needs a new ad agency. rsdsharp Aug 14 #2

You just know orangecrush Aug 14 #3

And there is no doubt in my mind that this was the work... 3catwoman3 Aug 14 #7

It may have been orangecrush Aug 14 #8

Eewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! 3catwoman3 Aug 14 #5

Yup orangecrush Aug 14 #6

Nope Solly Mack Aug 14 #9

True Dough

(24,962 posts)

1. Five-alarm inappropriateness!

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:17 PM

Aug 14

orangecrush

(27,209 posts)

4. What ever do you mean?

Reply to True Dough (Reply #1)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:39 PM

Aug 14

rsdsharp

(11,475 posts)

2. Someone needs a new ad agency.

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:22 PM

Aug 14

orangecrush

(27,209 posts)

3. You just know

Reply to rsdsharp (Reply #2)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:39 PM

Aug 14

They guy who made this ad had bragging rights for life when he slipped this one past the editors

3catwoman3

(28,037 posts)

7. And there is no doubt in my mind that this was the work...

Reply to orangecrush (Reply #3)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 05:15 PM

Aug 14

...of a guy. None at all.

orangecrush

(27,209 posts)

8. It may have been

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #7)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 05:22 PM

Aug 14

A completely innocent oversight?

3catwoman3

(28,037 posts)

5. Eewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:53 PM

Aug 14

orangecrush

(27,209 posts)

6. Yup

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #5)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 05:11 PM

Aug 14

Solly Mack

(95,946 posts)

9. Nope

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 10:18 PM

Aug 14

Reply to this discussion