The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsGrammatical pet peeves
There are some things that just grind my gears, yet they are so common, even in journalism, that they are almost standard today. I can't really tell you which is my no. 1, so I'll just list them in no particular order.
1. Could of, would of, should of. NO! It's could HAVE, would HAVE, should HAVE! I learned this in fourth grade, FFS!!! Where were you? This is just lazy.
2. "Here's what" to know. Grrr. Unnecessary verbiage, and silly besides. Either "What to know", which makes perfect sense and is concise and to the point, or "This is what to know," which is grammatically correct but unnecessary verbiage. "Here's what" is lazy.
3. What I call the "sportscaster glitch" because that's where I hear it most often, and usually (forgive me) from male sportscasters. The women don't seem to do it as much. "He ran such and such, did Lawrence," is my imperfect example, but anyone who's listened to or watched football or basketball has heard this absolutely cringey thing repeatedly.
Okay, what are yours? This is my diversionary tactic on a Monday morning.
justaprogressive
(6,321 posts)which would suggest that "Outstanding" is the name of a game!
Correct: to play Outstandingly
to play outstanding football
XXXX whose play is outstanding...
Adjectives are not adverbs!
Frasier Balzov
(4,896 posts)Not so much a grammatical error, more of a verbal crutch.
As though the speaker is desperately seeking unearned concurrence.
Once you notice it, you will begin to observe how pervasive a speech pattern this has become.
The Roux Comes First
(2,163 posts)Several come to mind.
I never subscribed to the idea that "data" suddenly transformed into a singular noun. It's as if we suddenly moved wholesale to the metric system without even any real debate on the subject.
There are several less-common verbs that seem to be frequently cast recently as no longer having separate forms for various tenses. I'm struggling to think of the two or three I see every week or so, where the over-simplistic lazy approach of adding a suffix is commonly used now. The verb "slide" is not one, but it comes to mind I guess because at least one offender starts with "s." I have yet to see "slided" in use, but it would be the equivalent, with "slid" having been discarded.
And a more general "bone" is what seems like an overall deterioration in the quality of editing and proofreading in journalism. Onerous grammatical and even spelling errors feel rampant these days, even in headlines. Or is it just my growing curmudgeon?
Jilly_in_VA
(13,829 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 12, 2026, 05:24 PM - Edit history (1)
"Verbing weirds language"!
Wounded Bear
(63,878 posts)Many articles are published directly by the author, all of whom should really know better, but apparently don't.
The Roux Comes First
(2,163 posts)Most of the technically trained engineers and scientists I worked with for decades "knew" they were gifted with the language (look at all the education they had!) and tended to disrespect and even dodge proofers and editors (and rarely if ever even knew the difference), and greatly resented it when their foibles (not to mention their self-delusion!) were pointed out, often through multiple drafts.
A secondary point - never rely on built-in spell-check and other features if you care how you come across in print. Re-read your work before publishing. And then re-read it again. Of course that assumes you are a careful and thorough reader - often not a good assumption.
Wounded Bear
(63,878 posts)I check sometimes with unfamiliar words, but generally I turn off spell check and proof read myself.
2naSalit
(100,132 posts)Peeves mentioned above plus misplaced apostrophes!
And the inability to know the difference between then and than.
That's all I can think of at the moment. Disclaimer though, sometimes I misused words and spelling for expression in some contexts.
yellow dahlia
(4,639 posts)Aaaargh!
LoisB
(12,399 posts)question everything
(51,708 posts)Croney
(4,991 posts)Yes, I know it's accepted usage now. I just don't like it. Also, "impact" as a verb. Same reason.
hlthe2b
(112,883 posts)recently. There is a woman who does a commercial for Shopify (I think) and it is constantly all about how she "leveled up" with her business this and on and on...That is where I have heard the term most recently (and constantly), but I know it is in use for other ads too--as well as among the talking heads in round-table discussions about anything but gaming.
Other than that, the constant use of "me and him/her/group etc." went somewhere or did something. Even those who should (seemingly) know better. Ditto the use of "ain't" when I know they know better and that is increasingly being used in ads. I don't mean when they are intentionally trying to make a point, but just use it.
I will add the mandatory qualifier that I have been known to make my share of grammatical errors as well as spelling mistakes (or typos). But, I don't make the most obvious ones (or at least not more than once if pointed out).
efhmc
(16,113 posts)Use to holler at the TV every time she did it. Which was often: i.e."between you and I"
MIButterfly
(2,135 posts)In the time it took me to write my post, you posted yours.
3catwoman3
(28,635 posts)You never hear anyone say "between we."
yellow dahlia
(4,639 posts)LoisB
(12,399 posts)MIButterfly
(2,135 posts)Example: "He took a picture of my brother and I." You wouldn't say "He took a picture of I"; why would you say "He took a picture of my brother and I"? I know it's extremely common; I hear it all the time. I even see it written by professional writers, such as authors and journalists (in other words, people who should know better) and I don't understand it at all. Is it trendy? Grammar isn't supposed to be trendy.
Drives me straight up a wall.
And then they'll say "Me and my brother had our picture taken" instead of "My brother and I had our picture taken."
efhmc
(16,113 posts)Agree "great minds".
3catwoman3
(28,635 posts)If you can get it right in the plural, why not in the singular.
Callalily
(15,314 posts)Use "between" for two distinct items, concepts, or points in space/time
Use "among" as a preposition meaning in the middle of, included with, or in a group of three or more things/people, indicating a collective or indistinct relationship
Rastapopoulos
(727 posts)and require plural verbs, to be strictly correct. I've pretty much given up on those, though.
boonecreek
(1,396 posts)No, it's I couldn't care less.
Not knowing the difference between your and you're.
sorcrow
(656 posts)I worked with a PhD engineer who consistently exchanged them. He would have done better if he had just used one of them, and then he would be right at least half the time.
Regards,
Sorghum Crow
Iggo
(49,670 posts)(See YouTube video titles for mountains of evidence.)
Its a sentence fragment. The whole sentence is Here is what to know.
Wounded Bear
(63,878 posts)Funny thing is, that it's usually "loose" being used wrong, and it's a letter longer.
Skittles
(169,691 posts)goose is not pronounced GOOZE, moose is not pronounced MOOZE so I don't really understand why people get LOSE/LOOSE wrong so often
Totally Tunsie
(11,592 posts)"You only pay for what you use."
NO!
You don't "only pay"...You pay for only what you use.
I wince each time I hear that misplaced usage.
Wounded Bear
(63,878 posts)3catwoman3
(28,635 posts)And the plural possessive of guys is guys', NOT guyses! I've even heard Rachel Maddow use this. It makes me want to scream.
Blues Heron
(8,420 posts)Also missing Ts but thats more of a pronunciation peeve.
And of course of course instead of your welcome
Rizen
(1,029 posts)and one of the ways I write unintelligent characters is by having them use bad grammar.
surfered
(11,672 posts)MIButterfly
(2,135 posts)No, no, 1,000 times no.
Who the hell started that? I see it everywhere.
Skittles
(169,691 posts)I always wonder if people who say that know how ignorant it sounds.
yellow dahlia
(4,639 posts)Skittles
(169,691 posts)made me cringe
Enter stage left
(4,278 posts)It should be "what do you have?"
I hear it constantly on TV and normal conversation, it drives me crazy.
Wounded Bear
(63,878 posts)yellow dahlia
(4,639 posts)Disrespect as a verb. It may have become acceptable in the vernacular, but not by me.
bif
(26,685 posts)I hate what I call "Like-speak".
Jeebo
(2,552 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 13, 2026, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)
I retired 11 years ago after 45 years in the newsroom of a morning newspaper. For some reason, some grammar errors don't really bother me, but there are quite a few that drive me up the wall. There is the difference between "lie" and "lay", for example. Many of my former co-workers don't get that. Ditto the difference between between "waiting for" and "waiting on". "Waiting on" is an active state; "waiting for" is a passive state. That's why your waitperson in your favorite restaurant is actively waiting on you, while you are sitting there passively waiting while the waitperson is filling your order. I have lots more, but no time to think of them now. Some have been noted in this thread by other posters, though.
-- Ron
On edit: Fixed misspelling, can't believe I did that. I worked as a proofreader for that newspaper, too, but that was 50+ years ago, and my aging eyes just can't spot typos like they used to.
Jilly_in_VA
(13,829 posts)"Waiting on" is perfectly good Southern-speak, and I'm quite used to it, having heard perfectly genteel older folks use it for much of my life. It's like waiting "on line" which I never heard until I was exposed to New Yorkers in college, or a number of other regionalisms.
Ptah
(34,001 posts)Talitha
(7,698 posts)Often mispronounced by people who know better.
GreatGazoo
(4,492 posts)Normal is a range. Average is a specific number.
And why is "wind chill" only applied when it is cold and "with the humidity" only applied when it is hot?