The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsOK, steak experts/foodies: 'filet mignon' vs 'filet'.
This has happened to me twice in the last several months.
Once at Texas Roadhouse and again yesterday at a local bistro.
The menu reads "FILET,Dry aged, hand cut, 8 oz."
Pricey.
Yesterday it was $26. WAY more than I'd pay for any restaurant meal, but it was a special occasion.
Came with a couple of sides.
What we were served, at both restaurants, looked like a rib-eye.
Not quite as big, and not nearly as thick as I like a rib-eye.
Yesterday's was about 3/4".
Both time I questioned the waitress.
"We ordered the filet. This looks like a rib-eye."
Both time I was told, yes, that's a filet.
So...do I have to make sure the menu reads "Filet MIGNON"?
Is there a difference?
Evidently there is.
I await your comments with much anticipation.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)from the small end of the tenderloin...it is round...with almost no fat...and usually cut at least 1.5 inches thick...
If yours looked like a rib-eye with the generous marbling of rib-eye...that's what it was...as fillet means to slice, I think some places take advantage of the fact that people expect a Filet Mignon.
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)trof
(54,256 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)No confusion there.
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)Don't believe the propaganda that its meant to be shared.
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)Those usually need to be shared; a small sliver in trade with a table partner.
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I am a vegetarian, but I fondly remember Chateaubrian in my meat-eating days.
JVS
(61,935 posts)The texture is very tender, to the point that your could even say mushy.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)she hated fish!
Kali
(55,019 posts)kind of a directional thing
I prefer a ribeye as a first choice in steak, myself. filet is almost too soft and lacks flavor unless it is an exceptional case. (and it rarely seems to be worth the $$$ even when it is good)