Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blogslut

(38,001 posts)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 02:31 AM Jun 2013

Am I the only one that finds the prose of Charles Dickens to be erotic?

I'm a simple high school graduate with about 16 hours of college under my belt. I'm on a mission to become more well-read and have been working my way through famous authors - also, most of those books are free, so, win/win. I've already read a fuckton of Shakespeare because I was once a theater major. I'll have to come back to Les Miserables because, while every single word is poetry, I'm almost 200 pages in and Hugo is still describing how supernaturally nice that damned priest is - exhausting!

I keep coming back to Dickens. I've read Oliver Twist, A Tale of Two Cities, Great Expectations, The Old Curiosity Shop and am currently 3/4 of the way through Bleak House.

Here's the deal. Reading Dickens gets me a little "bothered" and I don't mean just the romantic parts. I mean all of it. I mean his style. I does things to me. It's not like like Oscar Wilde and The Portrait of Dorian Gray which was so homoerotic I almost fainted. Dickens doesn't appear to be hinting at anything. He just tells stories. He just tells wonderful, funny, tragic stories with a voice that melts me.

Am I the only one?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Am I the only one that finds the prose of Charles Dickens to be erotic? (Original Post) blogslut Jun 2013 OP
You are not alone. PassingFair Jun 2013 #1
I'll let you know blogslut Jun 2013 #5
"Dickens doesn't appear to be hinting at anything." Chan790 Jun 2013 #2
Well, I meant, as in: sexually suggestive blogslut Jun 2013 #7
ever watch the miniseries of various Dickens stories on BBC? TorchTheWitch Jun 2013 #12
Ah, back in the day when a writer could write narrative description without Baitball Blogger Jun 2013 #3
I don't know, but I sure give you credit! femmocrat Jun 2013 #4
I've always been partial to non-fiction blogslut Jun 2013 #8
love Dickens. n/t Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2013 #6
From the first page, he just grabs you. blogslut Jun 2013 #9
Great prose stylist, yes, but what struck me was the contrast between his earlier and later work. nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #10
Definately not alone. Smickey Jun 2013 #11
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
2. "Dickens doesn't appear to be hinting at anything."
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:46 AM
Jun 2013

Actually the opposite, but that's part of what makes him awesome. He was above-all a propagandist, writing about what he viewed as the social evils of his day: child labor, poverty, class oppression--using his writing as a pulpit to push and shame those that profited from the misery of others. He did it well enough that he began to change British society and the way they viewed and approached these problems almost immediately. He was not only a great writer but a better social activist.

We could use a few Dickens today.

blogslut

(38,001 posts)
7. Well, I meant, as in: sexually suggestive
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 06:20 PM
Jun 2013

But, absolutely. The telling of child labor, poverty and class oppression is evident in Dickens. Poor little Jo in Bleak House...I just want to scream.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
12. ever watch the miniseries of various Dickens stories on BBC?
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 06:59 AM
Jun 2013

I loved them all. Just watched Bleak House again for like the 10th time. I sobbed my eyes out over poor Joe in the film. I also watched Little Dorrit again a couple of weeks ago. BBC did an awesome job on all the Dickens tales.

I love how Dickens chose names for his characters that exactly fit their personalities.



femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
4. I don't know, but I sure give you credit!
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 09:46 AM
Jun 2013

A couple of years ago I got tired of non-fiction, so I thought I should devote my time to reading classic literature. That lasted two summers. I can't decide whether life is too short to plow through those books.... or life is too short to read junk.

blogslut

(38,001 posts)
8. I've always been partial to non-fiction
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 06:30 PM
Jun 2013

And for decades, I deliberately avoided fiction because I hate emotionally investing in characters and prose that leave me cold. I would rather re-read authors that I know are good than take a chance on someone new to me.

For example. Fuck Poe. Whiny. Formulaic. Far too in love with the sound of his own blah, blah, blah.

On the other hand, a positively delightful surprise: Arthur Conan Doyle. What fun!

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
10. Great prose stylist, yes, but what struck me was the contrast between his earlier and later work.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:03 PM
Jun 2013

I took a college class where we read 'Oliver Twist' (1837) and 'Great Expectations' (1860) in fairly quick succession. Compared with the younger Dickens, the Dickens of 'GE' writes noticeably more nuanced, less cartoonish characters, and his prose is less "flowery." 'OT' is a classic for other reasons - great story, sympathetic hero, great villains - but it definitely seems as if Dickens got more naturalistic in his writing as he got older.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Am I the only one that fi...