Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 02:34 AM Aug 2013

Had to reject printing an image today at work...

A mother brought in her daughter, who I think was below the age of 18, to have images processed from a thumb drive. A lot of the images were fairly inappropriate but I just kept ordering and flipping through as quickly as possible as there was nothing truly illegal about the content. That is of course until I got to an image that I absolutely could not knowingly reproduce on my work's computers and printer.

Two or three teenagers half naked and one of them was wearing a gas mask bong.

Just another example of EXCELLENT parenting. Oy. I swear to God, some of the shit I see in retail makes me question the future of humanity.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Had to reject printing an image today at work... (Original Post) Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 OP
Reminds of the naked Brooke Shields pictures jakeXT Aug 2013 #1

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
1. Reminds of the naked Brooke Shields pictures
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 06:02 AM
Aug 2013
Brooke Shields posed for him both as a normal young girl and in the nude, her body heavily made up and oiled, receiving a fee of $450 from Playboy Press, Gross’s partner in the project. Her mother signed a contract giving Gross full rights to exploit the images of her daughter. The series was first published in Little Women, and then in Sugar and Spice, a Playboy Press publication. Large prints were also exhibited by Charles Jourdan on 5th Avenue in New York.
..

Brooke Shields claimed that her mother had agreed to give up her rights for one publication only and that the photographs caused her embarrassment. In addition, they had been published, and would probably be published again, in revues of dubious morality. Her lawyers immediately obtained a provisional measure forbidding the use of the pictures until the end of the trial. The case was won by Gross with the court considering the contract signed by Brooke Shields’ mother to be valid and binding on her daughter. Brooke Shields appealed and once again obtained a provisional ban on the use of the photographs.

Finally, after a procedure lasting for two years, the appeal court confirmed that Brooke could not invoke her right to annul the contract and that she was legally bound by her mother’s signature.
...


(link includes nude pictures)
http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/tag/brooke-shields/
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Had to reject printing an...