Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ben Affleck is the new Batman (Original Post) Frank Cannon Aug 2013 OP
"Not sure how I feel about this..." Earth_First Aug 2013 #1
Fortunately I got bored with simple super heroes a few years ago CBGLuthier Aug 2013 #2
+1 Earth_First Aug 2013 #3
I honestly think he'll do fine in the role. RudynJack Aug 2013 #4
Matt Damon as Robin???? LongTomH Aug 2013 #23
What a terrible mistake dr.strangelove Aug 2013 #5
After the last Batman series davidpdx Aug 2013 #6
Seems a little old for the part, unless he's playing mid-career Batman. Bucky Aug 2013 #7
Seriously? Xyzse Aug 2013 #8
When I heard that Keaton would play the 1989 Batman, I knew it would suck Orrex Aug 2013 #9
Keaton did a great job as Batman. Frank Cannon Aug 2013 #19
Imagine how good it could have been with a great director! Orrex Aug 2013 #20
Actually, Keaton's Batman had some good points..... LongTomH Aug 2013 #22
Pictured: the new Bat-Suit Erose999 Aug 2013 #10
Needs nipples. Gidney N Cloyd Aug 2013 #11
My first reaction, and only reaction so far Broken_Hero Aug 2013 #12
Sheesh. Doesn't Hollywood have better things to make. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2013 #13
Hey, now, Kick-Ass was pretty good. Frank Cannon Aug 2013 #18
Like I've said, even a spoof on the genre like Kick-Ass. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2013 #21
How many Batmen will erase one Daredevil? Orsino Aug 2013 #14
I want Gilbert Gottfried to be Bat Man . olddots Aug 2013 #15
Keaton was my favorite Batman Recursion Aug 2013 #16
I think Affleck could be fine in the role NewJeffCT Aug 2013 #17

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
3. +1
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 07:18 AM
Aug 2013

I agree.

Most Hollywood production doesn't do 'it' for me anyways.

Give me a riveting Nature or Nova documentary, most PBS programming really...and you'll capture my full attention...

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
6. After the last Batman series
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 08:30 AM
Aug 2013

It will be very hard to top anyone else playing that part. Micheal Keaton, Val Kilmer, and George Clooney all sucked in the role.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
8. Seriously?
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 09:17 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Fri Aug 23, 2013, 03:51 PM - Edit history (4)

I don't know... I would have preferred Tyler Hoechlin who would not have been that good either.
But I thought he'd be able to keep up as a Batman.

Now looking online a bit more, it seems that it is confirmed.

Well, carp.

I still want Scott Adkins to play Batman. I guess Ben could be ok.

Who am I kidding, I am going to watch this any way.

Orrex

(63,208 posts)
9. When I heard that Keaton would play the 1989 Batman, I knew it would suck
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 09:35 AM
Aug 2013

And I was right--the 1989 Burton film does suck. It's horrible.

But not because of Keaton. To my surprise, he was actually pretty good.


I have nothing against Ben Affleck. He's shown himself to be a competent director, and I believe he'll do fine in the role.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
19. Keaton did a great job as Batman.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 08:24 AM
Aug 2013

He did an even better job when you figure how much the deck was stacked against him at the time. I mean, this was they guy that played Beetlejuice, for crying out loud. But if he didn't match the comic book character physically (in the way that Christian Bale does), he portrayed the voice and the attitude perfect, for both the costumed and uncostumed Bruce Wayne.

Orrex

(63,208 posts)
20. Imagine how good it could have been with a great director!
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 09:09 AM
Aug 2013

I saw Burton's Batman three times in the theater, but at this point I find it close to unwatchable. As you note, Keaton did fine, but the film simply hasn't aged well.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
22. Actually, Keaton's Batman had some good points.....
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 02:33 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:19 PM - Edit history (1)

Burton's Gotham City was a tribute to early 20th Century German expressionism and Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1927).

There were interesting reflections on freedom, insanity and what it means to be an outsider. Quoting Tim Burton:

"The Joker is such a great character because there's a complete freedom to him. Any character who operates on the outside of society and is deemed a freak and an outcast then has the freedom to do what they want... They are the darker sides of freedom. Insanity is in some scary way the most freedom you can have, because you're not bound by the laws of society"


Another film homage was the Batmobile ride, with Vicki Vale, through the stylized, skeletal forest, with a creepy musical background; that's very reminiscent of a scene in the 1960 French thriller: Eyes Without a Face.

Broken_Hero

(59,305 posts)
12. My first reaction, and only reaction so far
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 12:52 PM
Aug 2013

is that this is a huge mistake. When Affleck was rumored to play Supes in 05/06 for Superman Returns, if he got the role I wouldn't go see the movie, and I"m a pretty die hard Superman fan. I can't take Affleck seriously, you do remember DareDevil right? I think this is a huge mistake....

DinahMoeHum

(21,784 posts)
13. Sheesh. Doesn't Hollywood have better things to make. . .
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 01:12 PM
Aug 2013

. . .than these remakes upon remakes on superheroes? With more techno-crap?

Frankly, even a bad movie like Kick-Ass or Kick-Ass 2 is preferable these days. (And they're not really suitable for kids, either). At least they spoof the superhero genre, even though much of the violence and bad language are gratuitous.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
18. Hey, now, Kick-Ass was pretty good.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 08:15 AM
Aug 2013

I would actually have to count it among the top superhero flicks of the last 10 years. It was very sarcastic and tongue-in-cheek, and it treated the whole idea of actual, real-life superheroes with the respect it deserves.

I haven't seen the sequel, but I hear it doesn't fare as well.

DinahMoeHum

(21,784 posts)
21. Like I've said, even a spoof on the genre like Kick-Ass. . .
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 10:32 AM
Aug 2013

. . .is preferable to the pretentious garbage and CG-techno-violence in most superhero movies that pose as societal commentary.

And I gotta confess: I saw Kick-Ass 2 at a midnight showing a few days ago. And I laughed until it hurt.

Memorable quote:
"Hit-Girl": Robin wishes he was me

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
15. I want Gilbert Gottfried to be Bat Man .
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 02:42 PM
Aug 2013

if they are going to keep making these lame comic book movies could they at least get creative with casting ?

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
17. I think Affleck could be fine in the role
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 06:33 PM
Aug 2013

It's a Superman movie, so Batman could only have a handful of scenes... though, obviously they would be important scenes. If Affleck is limited in his screen time and given some decent lines, he'll be fine, I think. He wasn't bad in his recent movies like Argo, and maybe he'll be more confident on screen given his success as a director?

Plus, he has the square jawed look that Batman is supposed to have.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Ben Affleck is the new Ba...