Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

Logical

(22,457 posts) Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:38 AM Dec 2013

Our family's list of movies this Xmas week....

I'll be home for Christmas
Christmas Vacation
And Xmas eve....
Home Alone!

Been doing it for 12 years!

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Our family's list of movies this Xmas week.... (Original Post) Logical Dec 2013 OP

12 Years of "Home Alone"... Locut0s Dec 2013 #1

I would suggest you go ahead and do it anyway! nt Logical Dec 2013 #2

Are you saying... Locut0s Dec 2013 #3

No eye gouging at Christmas please! redwitch Dec 2013 #4

So was I! :-) Merry xmas! Hope you get to see a movie you love! Logical Dec 2013 #5

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)

1. 12 Years of "Home Alone"...

Reply to Logical (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:11 AM

Dec 2013

I think I might just gouge out my eyes.

Logical

(22,457 posts)

2. I would suggest you go ahead and do it anyway! nt

Reply to Locut0s (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:51 AM

Dec 2013

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)

3. Are you saying...

Reply to Logical (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:54 PM

Dec 2013

I should do so cause you agree with me or disagree? I was joking btw

redwitch

(14,944 posts)

4. No eye gouging at Christmas please!

Reply to Locut0s (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 05:14 PM

Dec 2013

Watch "A Christmas Story" instead. Or the 1951 version of "A Christmas Carol" (movie originally titled "Scrooge&quot .

"You'll shoot your eye out. You'll shoot your eye out."

Logical

(22,457 posts)

5. So was I! :-) Merry xmas! Hope you get to see a movie you love!

Reply to Locut0s (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 05:43 PM

Dec 2013

Reply to this discussion