Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, maybe men who get a viagra prescription should be forced to get a prostate exam... (Original Post) JCMach1 Feb 2012 OP
New checklist item... Chan790 Feb 2012 #1
You mean they are voluntary now? retread Feb 2012 #2
Plus, congress needs to pass a law that absolutely NO prostate exams or ED drugs will be LuckyLib Feb 2012 #3
I hope so. It costs me a lot more money to have that done downtown Major Nikon Feb 2012 #4
not really analogous pokerfan Feb 2012 #5
Anal pears for lil' blue pills then? Chan790 Feb 2012 #7
since they're dragging us back to the middle ages... pokerfan Feb 2012 #10
AND, boner pills and penile pumps should NOT be covered by insurance. n/t Lil Missy Feb 2012 #6
I actually agree. Chan790 Feb 2012 #9
but male enhancement is different pokerfan Feb 2012 #11
No 'maybe' about it! elleng Feb 2012 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #12

LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
3. Plus, congress needs to pass a law that absolutely NO prostate exams or ED drugs will be
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:38 PM
Feb 2012

covered by insurance.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
5. not really analogous
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 04:18 PM
Feb 2012

as a prostate exam serves a useful function. The invasive transvaginal ultrasound mandated in Virginia Occupy Vagina Bill serves no medical purpose and the woman isn't even required to view the results. It's only about humiliating women by shoving a foreign object up their hoo-hoos. A better analogy would be to require men to be anally violated with a broom handle or something.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
7. Anal pears for lil' blue pills then?
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:08 PM
Feb 2012

There'd be a lot fewer old Republicans having late-life babies (I'm wagering that sometime between now and 2016 Callista Gingrich bears Newt a publicity-munchkin) if they had to endure a butt-plugging to get their ED pills.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
9. I actually agree.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:12 PM
Feb 2012

But I'd ban coverage of fertility drugs at the same time.

Neither the ability to get it up or the ability to have a baby are medically-necessary. BC on the other hand, often is.

No mandated medical-coverage for the elective and non-necessary except to remedy the traumatic wrong. (ie. things like cleft-palate repair and reconstructive plastic surgeries are covered.)

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
11. but male enhancement is different
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 04:05 AM
Feb 2012

Boner pills are considered pro-creative so the church approves and endorses their use, i.e they're covered under their insurance. Hell, I could see them adding it to the sacrament.

"The proposal being considered in the Senate applies to all employers -- not just religious employers. And it isn't limited to contraception. Any employer could restrict access to any service they say they object to. That is dangerous and it is wrong. Decisions about medical care should be made by a woman and her doctor, not a woman and her boss.” (Jay Carney)

I say this to the 'pukes who want to make this a campaign issue:

Bring it on.

Response to JCMach1 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»So, maybe men who get a v...