The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsLed Zeppelin Sued: 'Stairway to Heaven' Was Plagiarized, Spirit Claims
Randy California, the late guitarist and writer of the band Spirit, accused Led Zeppelin for years of taking the opening chords of "Stairway to Heaven" from his song "Taurus," Philly.com reported. Spirit's founding bassist Mark Andes, now 66, is working with Philadelphia attorney Francis Alexander Malofiy to bring the suit.
Malofiy told Businessweek.com that the lawsuit Spirit plans to file will have present-day implications as he is also seeking an injunction to keep Led Zeppelin from using "Stairway to Heaven" on its upcoming rerelease album.
"The idea behind this is to make sure that Randy California is given a writing credit on 'Stairway to Heaven," Malofiy said. "It's been a long time coming."
Andes told Businessweek that it was only recently that he noticed the striking similarities between "Stairway to Heaven" and "Taurus."...
Only recently noticed - after 30 plus years (of a song nobody could escape) and a truck load of money later I'd say they missed their window
http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/led-zeppelin-sued-plagiarism-spirit/2014/05/20/id/572381#ixzz32Ik5S28O
bluesbassman
(19,379 posts)'Cause Randy ripped the arpeggios off of Davy's '59 instrumental "Cry Me a River".
orleans
(34,085 posts)bluesbassman
(19,379 posts)considered one of the influences behind the folk-rock genre of the sixties. Passed away in 2008. Here's one of his better known tunes:
"Angi"
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Arpeggios over a descending chromatic bass line are an old, old musical device.
Plus, it's been awhile since I've listened to Taurus, but I'm pretty sure it is a slightly different chord progression than Stairway to Heaven.
Ahpook
(2,751 posts)That is a typical run on a guitar.
We could go on and on naming songs that sound alike.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... but I'm pretty sure there is nothing illegal about stealing a short passage. You can't steal the words, you can't easily steal the entire cord structure/melody, but this is going nowhere IMHO, even though I agree it was stolen.
icymist
(15,888 posts)icymist
(15,888 posts)27 April 1927. The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927, Greenville, Mississippi. The river stage was at 46.8 feet. From: "The Floods of 1927 in the Mississippi Basin", Frankenfeld, H.C., 1927 Monthly Weather Review Supplement No. 29. Archival Photography by Steve Nicklas, NOS, NGS
Kansas Joe McCoy, Memphis Minnie:
If it keeps on rainin', levee's goin' to break.
If it keeps on rainin', levee's goin' to break.
And the water gonna come in, have no place to stay.
Well all last night I sat on the levee and moan.
Well all last night I sat on the levee and moan.
Thinkin' 'bout my baby and my happy home.
http://www.keeponliving.at/song/when_the_levee_breaks.html
(Recordings of the original at the link)
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Nothing wrong with an acknowledged cover version. Most of their other "borrowing" was a lot more underhanded than that one.
lame54
(35,331 posts)Got half-way through the first vid and didn't hear many similarities
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Covering classics is as old as music. Many artists would have not had a career without covering songs written by others -- Joe Cocker for example. The entire Motown catalog is covers, by design. The birth of hip hop was based on a riff from Chic's "Good Times." The present phase of covering music is mash-ups which don't even re-record the riffs but rather use them directly as recorded by the original artists:
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I am quite sure that Mr. Cocker credited and paid the songwriters of his songs. As for Motown, well they were an inhouse operation and you usually can plagiarize yourself. Jimmy Page just plain stole whole songs and said he wrote them and did not credit or pay anyone until he was sued. That is why he is a thief.
Mashups and samplers all pay and license and even credit their stuff nowadays.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Btw, music copyrights were never designed to protect the writers of the songs, only the publishers. The first music copyrights were issued for piano rolls used on player pianos, in effect 'recorded' music. Originally copyrights were for 7 years from the date of publication. It was unthinkable that one could own a chord progression and where would Jazz be if they were not allowed to riff on well known standards.
mulsh
(2,959 posts)[link:
|KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)There is an anecdote that Zep got permission (verbal) to use the finger picked circular chord progressions but even if they didn't...
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES THAT NO ONE IN SPIRIT EVER HEARD 'STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN' ?! (until now)
More likely the bass player is out of cash.
NoGOPZone
(2,971 posts)what the Zeppelin diehards think. As this article explains, there is enough evidence of plagiarism to make it to the trial stage,with an out of court settlement with undisclosed term the most likely outcome.
[link:http://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverherzfeld/2014/05/21/spirit-v-led-zeppelin-analysis-of-the-stairway-to-heaven-infringement-lawsuit/|