Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So far, which juror do you like best? #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, or #6? (Original Post) struggle4progress Apr 2012 OP
6 is a "bitchy snot-rocket" but i tend to agree with 2 the most. seabeyond Apr 2012 #1
2,3 and 5 are prime examples of good judgment. 4 is rather square, 6 considers many factors.n/t dimbear Apr 2012 #2
Well, s4p, In my case, juror number 3 needs to Lighten the Fuck Up!!! NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #3
Is there something wrong with you? Tobin S. Apr 2012 #4
My mom would say that too, in high school... are you "OK"? NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #5
damn! No.3 wrote you a whole sermon! provis99 Apr 2012 #7
I've found there's something odd about jurors 1, 3, and 5. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #6
I heard a rumor from a reliable source that juror #1 sells votes for the right price Major Nikon Apr 2012 #10
Nah, it is juror #6 that sell votes JonLP24 Apr 2012 #11
I know for a fact that juror #3 is a liar Major Nikon Apr 2012 #13
Who Is Number One? The Magistrate Apr 2012 #8
I am not a number.. PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #15
So You Opted Out of The Jury, Sir...? The Magistrate Apr 2012 #16
I Am Number Four Skip Intro Apr 2012 #9
One unionworks Apr 2012 #12
Juror #3 rules! Major Nikon Apr 2012 #14
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Well, s4p, In my case, juror number 3 needs to Lighten the Fuck Up!!!
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 09:30 PM
Apr 2012

Apparently, opining that the world would be better off without the likes of George Zimmerman or Thomas Kinkade (who literally swindled old people) is just beyond the pale, BEYOND I tell ya!

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Apr 7, 2012, 11:37 AM, and voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: It's ugly and I agree with the person who alerted. This is just so unnecessary.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Hide the post and BAN THE POSTER. Let me emphasize that: Delete the post and block the user. Openly wishing harm on someone is not only against our community standards here, it's just plain wrong.

The attitudes within the post are typical of the low standard to which too many people here on DU seem to hold themselves. For them, it's cool to hate openly Christian people and/or anyone whose work they question. It's fine to criticize Thomas Kinkade as an artist. It's another to dance on his grave.

As for George Zimmerman, the law ought to take its course. I think we all wish for justice for poor Trayvon Martin.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: If I have to explain my reason, there might be something wrong with you.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given


"BAN THE POSTER"!!!11!!



``



``

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
10. I heard a rumor from a reliable source that juror #1 sells votes for the right price
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 01:17 AM
Apr 2012

I've also heard that juror #3 is secretly working for the FBI.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
11. Nah, it is juror #6 that sell votes
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 01:22 AM
Apr 2012

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:41 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Hardly offensive. I doubt the poster in question was referring to progressive values in this case.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I heard a rumor that juror #6's vote can be bought.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: The post was a senseless personal attack. It had no context other than personal attack.

Though I could see #3 in the FBI as plausible, I mean how would he/she know?

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
14. Juror #3 rules!
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 01:45 AM
Apr 2012

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Apr 8, 2012, 12:28 AM, and the Jury voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said:


Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»So far, which juror do yo...