Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:23 PM Jul 2020

On Shooting the Moon.

Now, just to be clear, I am not a professional photographer. Not by any stretch!

I do know some things about getting pretty good moon photos, so since there's some interest in that, here are my ideas:

You will need:

1. A real camera, not a phone. (digital single lens reflex type)

2. A big zoom lens. I use a Tamron 18 mm to 400 mm.

3. A tripod. Really helps keep the camera steady so there's no blur in your photo!

4. A cable release cord, also to keep the camera from shaking.

5. Practice, practice, practice!

Here's a couple of my moon photos to hopefully inspire you:







33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On Shooting the Moon. (Original Post) CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 OP
Wow!! Alliepoo Jul 2020 #1
Thank you so much, my dear Alliepoo! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #2
Thanks, Cal Peggy. My problem is usually white balance (I think) erronis Jul 2020 #3
I have trouble with the moon and trees too. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #6
Shoot in raw and run through LightRoom... Ferrets are Cool Jul 2020 #10
Thank you. I haven't invested in photo editing apps yet. May try DarkRoom which is open-source erronis Jul 2020 #12
I am professional RE photographer so I have to have LR Ferrets are Cool Jul 2020 #22
Thanks, I'll keep you posted. I've been a long-time Adobe product user and have been burnt and erronis Jul 2020 #25
I broke down several years back and just subribed to the monthly fees and Ferrets are Cool Jul 2020 #27
Superb! Sherman A1 Jul 2020 #4
I have to agree about the Tamron lens. It's not quite as sharp as my old Tamron 16--300. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #7
Great shot! Sherman A1 Jul 2020 #13
Thanks! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #16
Sigma makes lens with different mounts for Canon, Sherman A1 Jul 2020 #18
That's what I thought. Thanks for the info! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #19
Peggy - Very nicely done. I haven't done any serious photography in years.... EarnestPutz Jul 2020 #5
That's great, an encouraging sign! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #8
Thank you, I'll try to. Funny how this Covid isolation at home is having.... EarnestPutz Jul 2020 #14
Just to add, in case someone hasn't already.... Ferrets are Cool Jul 2020 #9
You are absolutely right, my dear Ferrets are Cool! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #11
I would expect nothing less from you CP Ferrets are Cool Jul 2020 #23
R.E. trees and moon exposure. flamin lib Jul 2020 #15
Thanks for the tips.........but I think they are beyond me. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #17
I'd volunteer but it's a bit of a drive from Ft Worth to your place. flamin lib Jul 2020 #20
Just a bit of a drive, indeed! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #21
That is a great idea, but Ferrets are Cool Jul 2020 #26
Even easier than that if you have an OMD EM1 mkii. (or mkiii or 5 mkiii or 1x) flamin lib Jul 2020 #29
Genius! Going to put a link on post if that is OK? N/T Soph0571 Jul 2020 #24
Not sure what you mean, dear Soph! Can you clarify? n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #28
On my unless you are Peggy... Soph0571 Jul 2020 #30
Absolutely fine! Feel free, my dear Soph! n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2020 #31
Proper exposure is where folks normally get messed up. ManiacJoe Jul 2020 #32
BEAUTIFUL! HAB911 Jul 2020 #33

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
2. Thank you so much, my dear Alliepoo!
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:30 PM
Jul 2020

That's why I posted them. They don't always turn out this well.

Usually they do.

erronis

(15,303 posts)
3. Thanks, Cal Peggy. My problem is usually white balance (I think)
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:32 PM
Jul 2020

I try to catch the moon behind some tall trees (white pines) for the effect. Being able to actually see the tree details (sometimes dim green hues) and the bright moon is difficult.

I set my small travel camera (Sony RX-100 M3 24x70) on a timer and on a tripod.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
6. I have trouble with the moon and trees too.
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:39 PM
Jul 2020

Usually the camera wants to focus on the damn trees, but I don't!

Timers and tripods work wonders!

Ferrets are Cool

(21,107 posts)
10. Shoot in raw and run through LightRoom...
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:53 PM
Jul 2020

it is so powerful that you can do almost anything with a well exposed image. 😁

erronis

(15,303 posts)
12. Thank you. I haven't invested in photo editing apps yet. May try DarkRoom which is open-source
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:10 PM
Jul 2020

This sound like a good project for tonight, as long as tropical storm Fay lets me see the moon...

Ferrets are Cool

(21,107 posts)
22. I am professional RE photographer so I have to have LR
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 04:22 PM
Jul 2020

I've never heard of DarkRoom. I hope it works out for you.

erronis

(15,303 posts)
25. Thanks, I'll keep you posted. I've been a long-time Adobe product user and have been burnt and
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 04:26 PM
Jul 2020

priced out of their products so many times.

Anything PDF-oriented has lots of better alternatives, both commercial and free/OSS.

I'm not artistic so I never got into the PhotoShop world.

Here's a site I frequent that lists alternatives to various products of all different license types. YMMV of course.
https://alternativeto.net/software/darktable/reviews/

Ferrets are Cool

(21,107 posts)
27. I broke down several years back and just subribed to the monthly fees and
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 04:31 PM
Jul 2020

use them as a tax write-off. My first Photoshop was either 3 or 4. The last one that was sharable was 7. That was many many years ago.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
4. Superb!
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:34 PM
Jul 2020

We use the same lens it seems.

I went with the Tamron for the extra reach trading in my Sigma 18-300mm but almost wish I hadn't. Just seems that the old lens was a bit more sharp. I also use my Sigma 150-500mm for moon photos, with the requisite tripod (as the blasted thing is too heavy to hand-hold and the cable release you mentioned. That one does reasonably well for me. I used it during the eclipse (using a solar filter) and just plain got lucky with some great shots.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
7. I have to agree about the Tamron lens. It's not quite as sharp as my old Tamron 16--300.
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:45 PM
Jul 2020

But I wanted the larger reach too, damn it!

And I do not like changing lenses. I always think I'll drop it, or something will get in the camera or etc.

And the heaviness is an issue too. I have taken some hand-held photos of the moon when there wasn't time to get the tripod set up. and it's always just a tiny bit blurry. I need better software and knowing how to shoot in RAW.

Solar eclipses are worth whatever you can do to see and photograph them!

Here's my best solar eclipse photo, Aug. 2017:



Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
13. Great shot!
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:18 PM
Jul 2020

I keep hoping that Sigma will come out with a 18-400 (or better) lens and I can offload the Tamron. I am thinking of upgrading to the Sigma 150 to 600mm but haven't taken the plunge on that one yet, perhaps next year when the sales are going on in the Spring. This year I went with a new Sigma 105mm Macro and have been fiddling with that when I can.

I haven't gotten into shooting RAW either and I'm not one to spend time in front of the computer fixing images. I want to get it in the camera.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
16. Thanks!
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:21 PM
Jul 2020

I do want to learn how to shoot in RAW. I love tinkering around with the photos once they're in the computer.

I guess you could say I WANT IT ALL!



Do Sigma lenses work on Nikon cameras? Or do they make one just for Nikon? The way Tamron does.



Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
18. Sigma makes lens with different mounts for Canon,
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:24 PM
Jul 2020

Nikon and their own Sigma cameras. I have been happy with the ones I have had thus far.

EarnestPutz

(2,120 posts)
5. Peggy - Very nicely done. I haven't done any serious photography in years....
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:34 PM
Jul 2020

....and have thought recently to get back to it. Just checked the meter battery on the old Nikon and it still works!

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
8. That's great, an encouraging sign!
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:46 PM
Jul 2020

I have so much fun taking these photos!

Hope you'll post your photos when you get back to it.

EarnestPutz

(2,120 posts)
14. Thank you, I'll try to. Funny how this Covid isolation at home is having....
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:20 PM
Jul 2020

....unexpected side benefits as we look for things to do and still maintain social distancing.

Ferrets are Cool

(21,107 posts)
9. Just to add, in case someone hasn't already....
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:51 PM
Jul 2020

a full moon is the most uninteresting one to photograph. A half or quarter moon phase will show the craters and shadows. Much more interesting.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
11. You are absolutely right, my dear Ferrets are Cool!
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 02:57 PM
Jul 2020

In fact, if you look at my photos in this thread, none are full moons.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
15. R.E. trees and moon exposure.
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:20 PM
Jul 2020

Two things to try: set exposure for the moon as usual and use a flash to illuminate the trees.

HDR, high dynamic range. Bracket the exposure, 2 stops over and 2 under plus one as usual. Combine the three images using your regular post processing software. If you don't have software to to do it, you can find freeware here: https://fixthephoto.com/best-free-hdr-software.html

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
17. Thanks for the tips.........but I think they are beyond me.
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:23 PM
Jul 2020

I need personal help when it comes to this sort of thing. I get into trouble when I try to do it by myself.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
20. I'd volunteer but it's a bit of a drive from Ft Worth to your place.
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 03:32 PM
Jul 2020

I can coach you over the phone if you like. Let me know which free ware you choose, I'll download the same one and we can walk through the steps together. As for using the flash, just set your camera to manual, dial in the exposure you normally use and let the flash do it's thing. To quote Dear Leader, "What do you have to lose?"

Ferrets are Cool

(21,107 posts)
26. That is a great idea, but
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 04:27 PM
Jul 2020

it "can" be even easier than that.
Expose for the moon, which CP has down pat. Then just pop flashes on a couple of dozen frames with the flash at different powers until the desired effect is achieved. This is so easy now with the back screens on every digital cameras and even easier with mirrorless cameras, which I use exclusively now.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
29. Even easier than that if you have an OMD EM1 mkii. (or mkiii or 5 mkiii or 1x)
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 04:44 PM
Jul 2020

Push the button that says 'HDR' and then the shutter release. Camera makes 3 bracketed exposures and combines them in-camera. Voila! The mkii still needs a tripod, but the newer ones can be hand held.

Can do the same with focus stacking, up to 15 images combined in camera and hand held.

But now I'm just braggin'

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
32. Proper exposure is where folks normally get messed up.
Sat Jul 11, 2020, 12:14 AM
Jul 2020

The moon is in the sunlight; it is bright. Thus you need a fast shutter speed.

Your best bet is to use manual exposure since the black space round the moon is going to fool the camera's exposure meter if left in one of the auto-exposure modes.

An example exposure setting to start experimenting from:
ISO 200
f/8
1/250 sec

The longer your telephoto lens is and the more megapixels your camera has, the faster your shutter speed needs to be to prevent motion blur as the moon is moving right along.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»On Shooting the Moon.