Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
District of Columbia
Related: About this forumHouse Votes To Block D.C. Law Banning Discrimination Over Reproductive Health Choices
House Votes To Block D.C. Law Banning Discrimination Over Reproductive Health ChoicesRachel Sadon in News on May 1, 2015 10:33 am
Over the vehement objections of Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and other House Democrats, Republicans voted last night to strike down a D.C. law that bans discrimination based on reproductive health decisionslike having an abortion or taking birth control.
Ted Cruz introduced the measure to block the lawas well as another that extends the city's gay nondiscrimination laws to religiously affiliated educational institutionslast month.
While this particular law only applies to the District of Columbia, it sets a dangerous precedent for future legislation that could further weaken our long-held tradition of respecting Americans conscience rights," said Congressman Diane Black, who co-authored the resolution with Cruz.
The final vote of 228 to 192 was mostly along party lines; three Democrats backed the measure, and 13 Republicans opposed it.
Religious and anti-abortion groups hailed the decision.
Over the vehement objections of Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and other House Democrats, Republicans voted last night to strike down a D.C. law that bans discrimination based on reproductive health decisionslike having an abortion or taking birth control.
Ted Cruz introduced the measure to block the lawas well as another that extends the city's gay nondiscrimination laws to religiously affiliated educational institutionslast month.
While this particular law only applies to the District of Columbia, it sets a dangerous precedent for future legislation that could further weaken our long-held tradition of respecting Americans conscience rights," said Congressman Diane Black, who co-authored the resolution with Cruz.
The final vote of 228 to 192 was mostly along party lines; three Democrats backed the measure, and 13 Republicans opposed it.
Religious and anti-abortion groups hailed the decision.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1443 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Votes To Block D.C. Law Banning Discrimination Over Reproductive Health Choices (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
OP
We just need to pass the New Columbia Admission Act, and D.C. will become the 51st state
Chathamization
May 2015
#2
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)1. Washington DC needs to become part of a state.
The repukes all clamor about states rights... but they use this opportunity to override local law favored by the majority of the citizens of the city (probably overwhelming majority).
The reason for special designation for DC is likely long gone (the worry that one state would have too much influence on the federal government because the US capital is located within the state).
I vote that it goes to Virginia... possibly even turning that state a solid blue state.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)2. We just need to pass the New Columbia Admission Act, and D.C. will become the 51st state
So we'll need Dems in control of the Senate, House, and the White House. And we'll probably need filibuster reform (unless we have over 60 Dems in the Senate). I think these things are doable sometime in the next 10-20 years; hopefully statehood will come sooner rather than later.