Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Illinois

Paulie

(8,462 posts) Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:38 AM Feb 2015

Sun Times - 10 items on Rauners chopping block

Summary: kids, infirm, working poor.

http://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/7/71/378790/10-areas-rauners-chopping-block

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sun Times - 10 items on Rauners chopping block (Original Post) Paulie Feb 2015 OP

Hey, no poor person ever contributed to his campaign. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2015 #1

Appalling: and one small change could avoid all this frazzled Feb 2015 #2

Surprisingly no impact to any of the 1%ers... truebrit71 Feb 2015 #3

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)

1. Hey, no poor person ever contributed to his campaign.

Reply to Paulie (Original post)

Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:58 AM

Feb 2015

So, ergo, he owes them nothing. And nothing is what they will soon have.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)

2. Appalling: and one small change could avoid all this

Reply to Paulie (Original post)

Thu Feb 19, 2015, 11:36 AM

Feb 2015

A graduated state income tax.

Somehow, a crazy-ass amendment to the state Constitution was passed in 1970, that requires a flat-rate tax. At least Governor Quinn (I do miss him!) instituted a short term hike in that rate, to 5%. Of course, that has recently expired, and it is at a measly 3.75%. Rauner swears he will reduce it to 3%.

Who suffers? The children, the infirm, the working poor. We cannot balance the budget on the backs of the least among us. It is ... appalling.

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)

3. Surprisingly no impact to any of the 1%ers...

Reply to Paulie (Original post)

Thu Feb 19, 2015, 12:34 PM

Feb 2015

...I guess that's what he meant by 'Shake up Springfield'.....fucking asshole....

Reply to this discussion