Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,465 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 03:19 PM Aug 2013

A Wrigley Field Winner for Taxpayers

Has any local media outlet reprinted this, or a similar comment?

This one is from the WSJ from a few weeks ago

(snip)

Now the Cubs are showing a new wrinkle in their inclination to spend—one that brings none of the dread that once met the team's big player signings. Owner Tom Ricketts, an investment banker and the son of TD Ameritrade online broker Joe Ricketts, is planning a half-billion-dollar renovation of Wrigley Field. Remarkably, in an era when teams regularly blackmail cities and states for new stadiums or major renovations—pay us or we'll leave—the Cubs plan to foot the entire $500 million tab.

(snip)

Not that the team didn't try the usual gambit of demanding taxpayer help. In 2010, the Cubs insisted that Chicago contribute about $200 million dollars for the renovation. But the city held firm, resisting an economic trap that has snared many municipalities.

Chicago is clearly among the minority of cities not seduced by arguments that plowing taxpayer dollars into sports facilities will produce an economic windfall and lots of jobs. In a 2000 study examining sports franchises in 37 cities from 1969 to 1996, economists Dennis Coates and Brad Humphreys found that building a new stadium "will have no effect on the growth rate of real per capita income and may reduce the level of real per capita income in that city."

Crain's Chicago reported last year that "over the last 22 years, during which 125 of the 140 teams"—in five sports—"have built or refurbished home stadiums—most using public subsidies—evidence shows the facilities rarely, if ever, live up to their 'measurable economic boost' billing."

(snip)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323610704578628281448934930.html

(If you cannot open by clicking, copy and paste the title onto google)

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Wrigley Field Winner for Taxpayers (Original Post) question everything Aug 2013 OP
no matter what they do.... madrchsod Aug 2013 #1

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
1. no matter what they do....
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 05:27 PM
Aug 2013

the cubs will suck and the fans will come there to get drunk. there`s a big backlash by the folks who pay billions of dollars for a 1-2 room apartment in that neighborhood. they did pledge to get rid of the troughs in the men's bathroom.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»A Wrigley Field Winner fo...