Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:31 AM Jul 2012

Court throws out state zoning for Marcellus Shale drilling

By Laura Olson / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

HARRISBURG -- A Commonwealth court panel this morning threw out Pennsylvania's attempt to establish statewide zoning for Marcellus Shale drilling.

The court ruled that the state cannot take away zoning control away from local municipalities as it tried to do when the Legislature passed Act 13 in February.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/marcellusshale/court-throws-out-state-zoning-for-marcellus-shale-drilling-646340/#ixzz21k7TY08h


This is FANTASTIC!!!




12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court throws out state zoning for Marcellus Shale drilling (Original Post) grntuscarora Jul 2012 OP
This is terrific... Now to convince those who are selling their mineral rights to quit doing so. freshwest Jul 2012 #1
That made me laugh. ag_dude Jul 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jul 2012 #3
I laughed ag_dude Jul 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jul 2012 #7
I don't think it's hillarious. ag_dude Jul 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jul 2012 #9
Great news! And a nice black eye for corbett! LOL femmocrat Jul 2012 #5
Still could be upheld by the State Supreme Court JPZenger Jul 2012 #6
Wow! blue neen Jul 2012 #10
This is welcome news. Curmudgeoness Jul 2012 #11
What do you predict the Supreme Court will say? MrMickeysMom Jul 2012 #12

Response to ag_dude (Reply #2)

Response to ag_dude (Reply #4)

ag_dude

(562 posts)
8. I don't think it's hillarious.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 03:15 PM
Jul 2012

I think your naiveté regarding the situation is.

I'm in the middle of the Eagle Ford boom and if you think you can convince poor farmers in bulk to turn down thousands an acre just for the right to drill (ignoring the potential windfall once the drilling starts) you have no business talking down to me. They live in the real world, not an internet forum where turning down the money out of principle is something you can just type and have it magically make sense.

One or two farmers here and there? Sure. I've seen plenty of little old ladies who were financially set, didn't want it on their place, and did it. Unfortunately the net effect is only that they go without the money while the fracking companies go next door and develop there.

Your entire idea depends entirely upon finding independently wealthy idealists. Unfortunately, they just don't live in rural areas in any sort of concentration large enough to put a stop to fracking. That doesn't even begin to address the issue of those who own mineral rights that don't actually live on the land. They kept those mineral rights for one reason and it aint out of the kindness of their hearts.

Between the insane amount of money being thrown around and politicians that can be bought by the bushel, the best hope to put an end to fracking is low crude and natural gas prices.

Response to ag_dude (Reply #8)

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
5. Great news! And a nice black eye for corbett! LOL
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jul 2012

Now we need that judge to toss out voter ID, and it will be two-for-two! (fingers crossed!)

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)
6. Still could be upheld by the State Supreme Court
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 01:26 PM
Jul 2012

I like this decision, but I think it could be overturned in the State Supreme Court. The legislature can change the laws regarding local municipalities whenever they want, as long as they don't violate the State Constitution (which doesn't address these matters).

This is a dress rehearsal for the Commonwealth Court's decision on Voter ID.

In both cases, the State Supreme Court will make the final decision. That court is currently tied Reps vs. Dems, with one member taking a leave of absence while she awaits criminal charges against her.

blue neen

(12,321 posts)
10. Wow!
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 06:33 PM
Jul 2012

I'm stunned! Good for Commonwealth Court! We still have someone in this state who has common sense!

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
11. This is welcome news.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jul 2012

That move to take local power away was a nightmare. Let's hope that this stands....because we know they will keep moving up the court chain of command.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Court throws out state zo...