Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,915 posts)
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:16 PM Aug 2013

Fire marshal: 5 facilities similar to West fertilizer plant refuse inspection

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Five facilities in Texas with large quantities of the same fertilizer chemical that fueled the deadly plant explosion in West have turned away state fire marshal inspectors since the blast, investigators said Monday.

A railway operator that hauls hazardous materials across Texas also allegedly rebuffed state efforts to share data since the April explosion at West Fertilizer Co., which killed 15 people and injured 200 others.

Regulators and state lawmakers at a hearing about the still-unsolved explosion were intrigued by the lack of cooperation. State Fire Marshal Chris Connealy said "well, sure" when asked whether those facilities refusing to admit inspectors raised concern.

"In their defense, they may have a very good reason," Connealy said.

More at http://www.reporternews.com/news/2013/aug/26/fire-marshal-5-facilities-similar-west-fertilizer/ .

[font color=green]My second thread today about weak regulatory authority in Texas. Will I find a third?[/font]

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fire marshal: 5 facilities similar to West fertilizer plant refuse inspection (Original Post) TexasTowelie Aug 2013 OP
What could possibly be a "good reason" to refuse? QSkier Aug 2013 #1
They don't want to get nailed even under TX lax laws. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #7
In Alaska, the FM office is part of the State Troopers DPS. Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #2
The only good reason not to cooperate is that they were not in compliance with safety rules Gothmog Aug 2013 #3
In case you're wondering if inspectors in Texas are bought, mbperrin Aug 2013 #4
5 Facilities Similar To West Fertilizer Plant Forgot Kickbacks To Fire Marshal thelordofhell Aug 2013 #5
Thanks! TexasTowelie Aug 2013 #6
 

QSkier

(30 posts)
1. What could possibly be a "good reason" to refuse?
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:21 PM
Aug 2013

"In their defense, they may have a very good reason," Connealy said.


That makes no sense!

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
2. In Alaska, the FM office is part of the State Troopers DPS.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:22 PM
Aug 2013

If you are a public company you can't deny them access.

Gothmog

(144,905 posts)
3. The only good reason not to cooperate is that they were not in compliance with safety rules
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:28 PM
Aug 2013

The fact that the Fire Marshall would condone non-compliance is simply amazing

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
4. In case you're wondering if inspectors in Texas are bought,
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:38 PM
Aug 2013

well, YEAH!

I think those who refuse inspection should simply be closed and auctioned off on the courthouse steps at a no-minimum auction.

thelordofhell

(4,569 posts)
5. 5 Facilities Similar To West Fertilizer Plant Forgot Kickbacks To Fire Marshal
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:40 PM
Aug 2013

There fixed the headline for you

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Fire marshal: 5 facilitie...