Texas
Related: About this forumWhy Democrats Are Losing Texas Latinos
Link to tweet
Why Democrats Are Losing Texas Latinos
By Jack Herrera
October 2021
In an interview with Javier Villalobos in early June, Fox Business host Stuart Varney presented his guest with a riddle. Villalobos, a Republican, had just won the mayoral election in McAllen, the Texas border town at the end of the last great curve of the Rio Grande. Varney, barely containing his glee, wanted the politician to help viewers understand the victory. Your honor, Varney addressed Villalobos, you are right on the border, eighty-five percent of the voters in your county are Hispanic, you are a Republican, and you won. Can you explain that? Because not many Americans expect a Hispanic electorate to go for a Republican mayor!
Villalobos promptly set Varney straight. I think a lot of people know, or should know, that Hispanics generally are very conservative. His triumph, he explained, wasnt stunning; he had simply met his voters where they were, with a conservative agenda of low taxes, limited government spending, and pro-business policies. Satisfied, Varney moved on to other questions familiar to South Texans who make national news. What did Villalobos think of the border wall? What about illegal entry of migrants? This part of the interview should have been routine. But Varney had apparently not learned the name of the town where Villalobos had been elected, mistakenly (and repeatedly) referring to McAllen as McLaren.
{snip}
onecaliberal
(32,882 posts)ColinC
(8,317 posts)"...we as [city] should not be burning the costs associated [with bridges and roads on the border], and clearly we are." He referred tot he bridges that immigrants use and seemed to imply hat the city cannot and should not by themselves maintain those things. Now a few days after this interview aired, the infrastructure bill, BIF, did pass. I imagine it will have provided funds for the things he is referring to.
peppertree
(21,650 posts)i.e. the need to side with those who despise you in order to fit in (or so they think).
During the inquisition, anyone with even vaguely 'Semitic' traits would, if confronted, insist they were "more Catholic than the Pope!" - in hopes of dispelling any suspicion they might be Jewish or Muslim.
Which, if suspected, was often tantamount to torture and/or death.
And so it is in an intimidating place like today's Texas: minorities - especially those who could "pass" for white - often feel they need to fit in as much as they can (if they can).
Or even outdo them, as in Rafael "Ted" Cruz's case.
walkingman
(7,646 posts)and not demanded a more equitable government. As far as being more "Catholic than the Pope" that is so true. Not being a Catholic, I am not sure what all that entails but as I tell my Catholic neighbors here in Central Texas....when I look at the history of the Catholic Church it scares the Hell out of me....maybe that is their intent.
Just another one of the subtle - and unfortunate - advantages right-wingers have in most countries: human pettiness, and the need to "belong" into whatever group is seen as dominant - even if they despise the poor fool.
UncleTomsEvilBrother
(945 posts)...helped the Democrats politically?
I mean...DACA is absolutely the right thing to do; however, republicans are openly against it and seem to be getting just as much support from Latino voters.