Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Vermont
Related: About this forumDavid Moats: The election and the anti-news impulse -- VTDigger
https://vtdigger.org/2024/12/15/david-moats-the-election-and-the-anti-news-impulse/The news is going to happen, and attention must be paid.
Its an epidemic. Among the cohort of my friends and relatives who consider themselves liberal, there is an almost universal reaction to the 2024 election: I just cant look at the news. Conversations overheard in town express the same sentiment. The voice and image of the president-elect are so repugnant to many people that they cant bring themselves to tune in.
I have had a similar reaction, which is a problem for someone who has spent his career as a news professional and who still writes about politics from time to time. It made me think about what is different between 2016 and 2024.
The election of 2016 was a shock, and the reaction to it was distinctive. The day after Donald Trumps inauguration in January 2017, Vermonters gathered in what may have been the largest protest demonstration in the states history. The Womens March in Montpelier brought thousands to the steps of the State House, motivated in part by Trumps history of abusive behavior toward women and his crass, misogynistic language. Similar demonstrations occurred throughout the country. And there were other issues of concern. Trump was planning discriminatory immigration policies, which led to his so-called Muslim ban, which in itself produced huge protest demonstrations.
Now Trump has been re-elected despite the fact that he has been found liable in civil court for defaming the woman he was found to have raped. So much for the ardent feminism of the Womens March. In fact, he was re-elected despite a long catalogue of crimes and misdemeanors that led to two impeachments. So much for liberal outrage.
I have had a similar reaction, which is a problem for someone who has spent his career as a news professional and who still writes about politics from time to time. It made me think about what is different between 2016 and 2024.
The election of 2016 was a shock, and the reaction to it was distinctive. The day after Donald Trumps inauguration in January 2017, Vermonters gathered in what may have been the largest protest demonstration in the states history. The Womens March in Montpelier brought thousands to the steps of the State House, motivated in part by Trumps history of abusive behavior toward women and his crass, misogynistic language. Similar demonstrations occurred throughout the country. And there were other issues of concern. Trump was planning discriminatory immigration policies, which led to his so-called Muslim ban, which in itself produced huge protest demonstrations.
Now Trump has been re-elected despite the fact that he has been found liable in civil court for defaming the woman he was found to have raped. So much for the ardent feminism of the Womens March. In fact, he was re-elected despite a long catalogue of crimes and misdemeanors that led to two impeachments. So much for liberal outrage.
...
Thus, as events unfold over the next few years, it will be hard for people to remain impervious to the news. At the same time, it will be all the more important for people to hold closely to the democratic values that eschew violence and promote equality and fairness. The news is going to happen, and attention must be paid.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Moats: The election and the anti-news impulse -- VTDigger (Original Post)
erronis
Monday
OP
Walleye
(36,316 posts)1. Well, one reason people don't want to pay attention to the news is because it's done so poorly
And many of us blame the news business for getting us where we are right now.
erronis
(17,118 posts)2. And we do rightly blame the news "business" for not doing their jobs correctly.
The business of selling news and making a profit for the owners underlies the problem. Cable "news" networks are a sad example.
There are good sources of news that seem to hue more closely to a good journalism model. Obviously The Guardian and ProPublica are good examples - both rely on donations for much of their operations. In Vermont VTDigger and SevenDaysVT have that same model. I'm sure there are many more locally and internationally.