Washington
Related: About this forumFormed by Megafloods, This Place Fooled Scientists for Decades
IN THE MIDDLE of eastern Washington, in a desert that gets less than eight inches of rain a year, stands what was once the largest waterfall in the world. It is three miles wide and 400 feet highten times the size of Niagara Fallswith plunge pools at its base suggesting the erosive power of an immense flow of water. Today there is not so much as a trickle running over the cataracts lip. It is completely dry.
Dry Falls is not the only curiosity in what geologists call the Columbia Plateau. Spread over 16,000 square miles are hundreds of other dry waterfalls, canyons without rivers that might have carved them (called coulees), mounds of gravel as tall as skyscrapers, deep holes in the bedrock that would swallow entire city blocks, and countless oddly placed boulders. All across southeast Washington, fertile rolling hills border eroded tracts of volcanic basalt, as if Kansas farmland and Utah canyon land had been chopped up and sewed together into a topographic Frankenstein.
The first farmers in the region named the rocky parts scablands and dismissed them as useless as they planted their wheat on the silt-rich hills. But geologists were not so dismissive; to them, the scablands were an enigma. What could have caused this landscape? It was a question hotly debated for several decades, and the answer was as surprising and dramatic as Dry Falls itself.
For that matter, so was the source of that answer: a high school science teacher named Harley Bretz. In 1909, the Seattle teacher visited the University of Washington to see the U.S. Geological Surveys new topographic map of the Quincy Basin, a large area on the west side of the Columbia Plateau. He was 27, with no formal training in geology, but when he looked at the map, he noticed a striking feature: a huge cataract (much like Dry Falls) on the western edge of the basin, a place where water appeared to spill out of the basin and into the Columbia River, gouging a canyon several hundred feet deep. The falls would have been bigger than Niagara, but there was no apparent source of water for themno signs whatsoever of a river leading to the cataract.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2017/03/channeled-scablands/?cmpid=org=ngp::mc=crm-email::src=ngp::cmp=editorial::add=SpecialEdition_Escape_20200805&rid=FB26C926963C5C9490D08EC70E179424
cilla4progress
(24,770 posts)neck of the woods! 👍
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)this. There was an ice dam in Montana in the Missoula area that held back large volumes of water.
Over time the ice dam broke releasing the large volumes of water to do their work of terraforming
the countryside into Idaho and Washington. Then the ice dam would establish again and the whole
process would be repeated.
more at link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missoula_floods
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)The coulees pictured look something like the oxbow lakes formed along the Mississippi River after the big flood. My dad and I used to fish in one near my delta home town. It was about 60 miles from the current path of the Mississippi River.
Course, the oxbow lakes there were surrounded by sand bars and soybean fields, no cool boulders or rock walls. But they looked like a gash in the earth, and there was good fishing there.