Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,034 posts)
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 03:56 PM Jan 2021

State Supreme Court's ruling on Fortney recall was 6-3 split

OLYMPIA — In court filings, Snohomish County Sheriff Adam Fortney argued that his public refusal to enforce the governor’s stay-home order did not amount to inciting the public to break the law.

The state Supreme Court disagreed, explaining why in a 6-3 ruling Thursday.

“Fortney underestimates both the significance of his words and the power of his office,” Justice Mary Yu wrote in the court’s legal opinion released Thursday, in a case about the recall effort against the sheriff.

The state’s highest court had decided in September what the sheriff’s opponents could write in a petition seeking to remove Fortney from office. Until now, justices had not explained in detail why they approved three of the charges to proceed.

https://www.heraldnet.com/news/state-supreme-courts-ruling-on-fortney-recall-was-6-3-split/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»State Supreme Court's rul...