Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 09:45 AM Dec 2014

ATF agent lost job after he found J.B. Van Hollen to be a customer of illegal guns.

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/11/wi-attorney-general-bought-illegal-guns

"Under federal law, firearms manufacturers must be licensed. A manufacturer is defined as “a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to manufacturing firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of the firearms manufactured.”

An ATF investigation into Smith, handled by the agency’s St. Paul, Minnesota office, did not result in charges against Smith. Messages left with Robert Schmidt, the ATF spokesman, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carol Kayser, who made the decision not to charge Smith, were not returned.

Dan Bethards, a 14-year undercover drug agent who brought allegations against Smith to state and federal authorities, was fired in October 2013 for violating several Department of Justice rules. He now works as a narcotics agent for the Lac Courte Oreilles tribal police department.

A tape recording Bethards said he made of his conversation with Nygren during the investigation last year also revealed that two of the weapons Smith made went to Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen."
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ATF agent lost job after he found J.B. Van Hollen to be a customer of illegal guns. (Original Post) midnight Dec 2014 OP
IOKIYAR Scuba Dec 2014 #1
It is an odd response to someone doing their job. midnight Dec 2014 #2
Does anyone doubt that it's retribution? Scuba Dec 2014 #3

midnight

(26,624 posts)
2. It is an odd response to someone doing their job.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 03:33 PM
Dec 2014

Wisconsin's whistleblower statute

"An employee of the State of Wisconsin, except for certain exceptions ... may not be retaliated against for disclosing information regarding a violation of any state or federal law, rule or regulation, mismanagement or abuse of authority in state or local government, substantial waste of public funds or a danger to public health or safety. An employee may disclose information to any other person. However, before disclosing information to anyone other than an attorney, collective bargaining representative or legislature, the employee must do one of the following: disclose the information in writing to the employee's supervisor, or disclose the information in writing to an appropriate governmental unit designated by the Equal Rights Division.

-- Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development



Read more: http://host.madison.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/doj-may-have-violated-state-s-whistleblower-protections-in-firing/article_c219369d-9597-5e2f-8df4-32650b3237e1.html#ixzz3Klo1mliT

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»ATF agent lost job after ...