Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appleannie1

(5,070 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:35 PM Feb 2014

Trick Websites Dupe Democrats Into Donating To Republicans

The National Republican Congressional Committee has set up a number of websites that look like they could be a Democratic candidate’s campaign page, unless you read the fine print. They may even violate a Federal Election Commission regulation, Campaign Legal Center expert Paul S. Ryan explained to ThinkProgress.
The NRCC has set up these pages for various congressional opponents, including Amanda Renteria (CA), Martha Roberston (NY), Kyrsten Sinema (AZ), Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ), Alex Sink (FL), and John Tierney (MA). Each follow a similar format; they list the candidate’s name “for Congress” to ask for donations:

According to Ryan, the websites appear to violate a Federal Election Commission regulation prohibiting political committees and parties from using a candidate’s name in special projects. The FEC considers websites, including microsites, a special project falling under this rule. The only exception is when the site makes it unambiguously clear it is opposed to the candidate. In Ryan’s opinion, the page set up under Tierney’s name “does not unambiguously show opposition to Tierney.” However, he noted, the FEC is “not a nimble organization” and it can take two years to complete an investigation, well past election day.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/03/3242381/republicans-trick-voters-donating-democratic-candidates/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trick Websites Dupe Democrats Into Donating To Republicans (Original Post) appleannie1 Feb 2014 OP
Good News, NRCC is going to give back contributions Gothmog Feb 2014 #1
Juanita Jean is calling out the GOP for this deceptive tactic Gothmog Feb 2014 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #3
ON The Media archaic56 Jul 2014 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2014 #6
Shocking captfoster5 Sep 2014 #7
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Sep 2014 #8

Gothmog

(145,628 posts)
1. Good News, NRCC is going to give back contributions
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 09:48 PM
Feb 2014

We need to get the news out that if you gave money to the RNCC due to this false ad, you can get your money back http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/republican-website-donations_n_4719196.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

The National Republican Congressional Committee is doubling down on its use of websites that appear to be in support of Democratic House candidates but actually direct money to the Republican campaign effort. However, the NRCC said it would give refunds to donors who were confused or misled and contributed to the organization inadvertently.

The lawyer in me believes that the RNCC is afraid being sued and so gave in quickly.

Gothmog

(145,628 posts)
2. Juanita Jean is calling out the GOP for this deceptive tactic
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 05:24 PM
Feb 2014
http://www.juanitajean.com/2014/02/04/like-deception-is-anything-new-to-the-gop/

Okay, so the Republican Party is trying to fool people into donating to them when the people think they’re donating to Democrats.

Well, alert the damn media. It ain’t like trying to fool people is virgin territory for them. This ain’t no damn pilgrim experience for Republicans.

Republicans are defending a series of websites they established that appear to support Democratic candidates for Congress, but instead direct contributions to the GOP.

The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) said its websites were not confusing, and accused Democrats of crying foul because their candidates were struggling.




They refused refunds until a donor went to the media about it and now they are all like …. oh, not us, we will be delighted to refund money.

However, headlines like this —


— can hardly be classified as “news.” It’s what they do in the normal course of business.

Response to appleannie1 (Original post)

archaic56

(53 posts)
4. ON The Media
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:13 PM
Jul 2014

ON the Media on NPR Has covered this a little bit. Last weeks show spoke of how the RETHUGS(as I affectionately call them) have 15 negative ads to one.I wonder how much this has undermined support we should have been giving to our POTUS> I do know this, if the Democrats want to beat them in NOvember (and I pray they do), then they best look into the dirty tricks the RETHUGS are pulling.I am speaking specifically of the money the REPUBLICAN p[arty gave FB. AS soon as the announcement was made of donations to Zuckerberg., Facebook turned into shill central.

They stopped grassroots movements in the seventies with dirty tricks.. Now they have tech.. Machiavelli would have been proud of todays Rethugs.

Response to appleannie1 (Original post)

Response to appleannie1 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Campaigns»Trick Websites Dupe Democ...