Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,479 posts)
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 01:45 PM Dec 2017

A pundit commented that if and when the Democrat will campaign against the tax "reform"

that the pugs will present it as "raising one's taxes" since, supposedly, employees will see the benefit in their next paycheck.

Duh, not every tax payer is an employee. Certainly not most seniors.

Thus, I will be happy to be a poster tax payer for the campaign.

Our taxes will rise mainly because of the elimination of the personal exemptions that have not been discussed much. At $4050 a person (in 2016) our taxable income will rise by $8100. (A family of four will see an increase of $16,200 that will not be offset by doubling the standard deductions, increase child credit, nor lower tax rate).

Also, we are trying to do the right thing by carrying a long-term care insurance as not to be a burden on tax payers for long term care. These policies are getting more expensive.

We also are trying to stay in our 30+ yr home and are using Home Equity Line of Credit to maintain it. But interest on this line is eliminated.

Thus, looking at our projected 2017 income tax return, we will owe more than $1,000 in taxes in 2018. Perhaps not much (enough for us) but certainly not a "reduction."


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A pundit commented that if and when the Democrat will campaign against the tax "reform" (Original Post) question everything Dec 2017 OP
Now you know why Bush chose the very expensive option louis-t Dec 2017 #1
Wow! This is horrible question everything Dec 2017 #2

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
1. Now you know why Bush chose the very expensive option
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 01:48 PM
Dec 2017

of sending everyone a check with his name plastered all over it. He cost me $100,000 in income, but at least I got that stinkin' $600.

question everything

(47,479 posts)
2. Wow! This is horrible
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:01 PM
Dec 2017

I remember when Bush came to town to celebrate the benefits for companies. One of them, a small, graphic design admitted that they were not going to hire any one but invest in more equipment..

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Democrats»A pundit commented that i...