Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:02 PM Apr 2016

What is wrong with you? You did it again tonight.

I have to say you can't have things both ways.

You come here, invade our group hide our posts and Ops. You made another attempt tonight. Sorry alerter this time that did not go so well for you did it? First you alert WITHOUT COMMENT! Then you get a 0-7 leave! LOL! Fail.

Guess what? That goes to the Admins. Remember what Skinner posted??? They are watching.

We still believe that the vast majority of DU members are perfectly capable of participating in a productive way, and serving on juries in a non-partisan way. But given the pervasively negative tone of discussions here, we think it would be wise to provide a greater incentive for people to do so. Going forward if we see anyone voting to leave the worst-of-the-worst posts, or voting in a nakedly partisan fashion to hide posts which are clearly legitimate, then we will remove that person's ability to serve on juries. (We are not going to provide any notification to members who lose their jury privileges, because under the messed-up values of primary season we think many of you would see it as some kind of badge of honor.)

So, please, do the right thing when serving and let's clean this place up a bit.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1013&pid=5098


Pretty sure that covers petty partisan alerts as well.

We get it, they want us silenced. Before Skinners amnesty they were driving us off the board, it was like a tag team here. What I find amusing are the threads where they ask us to respond to debate them. Then they laugh and high five when we don't, 'cause according to them? We got 'nuttin honey. As if they wanted our thoughts and opinions in the first place. Riiiiight. Why the hell should we respond to Ops that are purely flame bait where they will swarm and hide any and everything we say.

We see you~



Hillary Clinton Group ~

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What is wrong with you? You did it again tonight. (Original Post) sheshe2 Apr 2016 OP
What did they try to hide? Rose Siding Apr 2016 #1
Here sheshe2 Apr 2016 #3
It's a shame the jury block list is so small, even for members. IamMab Apr 2016 #2
Ha! sheshe2 Apr 2016 #5
I hate idiots. johnp3907 Apr 2016 #4
... sheshe2 Apr 2016 #6
K & R athena Apr 2016 #7
 

IamMab

(1,359 posts)
2. It's a shame the jury block list is so small, even for members.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:07 PM
Apr 2016

There's too many openly vicious accounts for just 15 spaces.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
5. Ha!
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:14 PM
Apr 2016

No kidding. 100 slots would be better.

However I got one from a troll that lied about my post and was banned a few minutes later. IMH opinion those should be reversed when they are banned.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»What is wrong with you? Y...