Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumIf you're wondering what happened to that thread I started...
I wrote an OP the other day in GDP that defended Hillary raising money legally, which included raising it from whoever she wanted.
The thread got a lot of responses and there was actually some decent back-n-forth without the usual stupidities.
Then, a BSer accused me of supporting Citizens United. He said Hillary was raising money illegally and quasi-illegally. I called him out for the baseless lie, asked him to provide proof to support his lie or to - as I put it - "with all due respect, ST*U."
That comment earned me a hide, and locked me out from making any further comments in a thread I started. This is a patently unfair practice, because it allows people to make comments against my posts while I am not allowed access to defend my position.
So, I did what I always do when this happens: I deleted my OP and all of my posts I had made in the thread. That takes the OP out of circulation for further comments as deleting an OP locks the thread, and by deleting all of my further comments, it makes mincemeat of any comments made in response to my posts, as my posts are now gone.
I'll be damned if I'm going to allow those people to comment on my OPs while I myself have been locked out from doing so.
hueymahl
(2,497 posts)sheshe2
(83,791 posts)Your comment is not welcome here. Take your ball and go on home. Bye.
Surely will be missed
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)whole lotta stuff needs taken to the curb.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)for this board---even when Hillary wins the nomination.
Fla Dem
(23,691 posts)It's very clear in the TOS that DU is here to support the Democratic nominee.
So whomever that maybe, either they get behind the nominee, shut up, or get out of DU.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)more once the nominee is set. But I get the doubt. I understand there was a lot of Obama trash talk allowed over the years...I am hopeful though!
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)nasty names including "undemocratic".
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)make it personal.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Cha
(297,321 posts)They can just whine amongst themselves.
hrc guy
(73 posts)they'll need extra cheese!
greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)BS always makes it sound as if Hillary was behind Citizens United when it was in fact a right wing funded hate video filled with lies targeting Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court ruled against Hillary thus opening up the flood gates for right wing spending on elections.
BS and his followers are ignorant of facts.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)I always make a point of saying that when it comes up. No one has a bigger stake against Citizens United than Hillary does.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)she's single-handedly responsible for the egregious Citizens United SCOTUS decision is unscrupulous, but effective.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,035 posts)Who tried to blame Citizens United on Obama. I corrected him pretty quickly that it was the Republican appointed judges on the Supreme Court who made the decision. I added that it was for this reason it was important the Democrats win no matter who the candidate.
I actually got near unanimous agreement from the other Sanders supporters at the table
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)protection?
Your "total deletion" tactic is the only way to deal with their insidious censorship.
Well done!
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)pandr32
(11,588 posts)...yet when we do they freak out. There is no way to win. Reminds me of an old saying: "Never argue with an idiot because people can't tell the difference!"
Good on you for taking out the thread and their delusional "victory"
athena
(4,187 posts)or explain why you don't support Bernie, they either alert your post, or they twist your words and keep changing the question until nothing makes sense any more.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)It is like falling down the rabbit hole!