Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumThe Case For Hillary
medium.com/@zacharyleven/the-case-for-hillary-3564233d524f#.3qfiwivfmThe case for Hillary Clinton is mostly a matter of rebutting the case against her. Once thats done, youre simply left with the most qualified candidate, and someone who is, by all reality-based measures, progressive (ranked the tenth most liberal senator). And just as important, someone who is capable of achieving results (Ill conclude with the case against Sanders, and theres a very, very strong case to make against him). Well start with this specific example, which I think is illustrative of the sorts of attacks we see made on Hillary. (...)
http://bit.ly/1SqdRxt
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 713 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Case For Hillary (Original Post)
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
OP
They have NO CLUE ... it's just a cut-and-paste list of attacks that they don't understand.
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#4
scuciti
(33 posts)1. "Most qualified" for what?
The status quo.
No thanks.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)2. buh bye
go post your crap elsewhere, that is not the Hillary group
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)3. What is the status quo?
How about a definition.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)4. They have NO CLUE ... it's just a cut-and-paste list of attacks that they don't understand.
This one must have been in a hurry, because he forgot to say "oligarchs".
Note to Jury: The above statements represent my opinion. No DU rules or terms of service have been violated. It is not against the rules to have an opinion that differs from the Alerter. --- REMINDER: Jury Duty is not intended to be a weapon to silence opponents. It's a community standards tool to enforce the terms of service. Use your best and honest judgement when deciding if this post violates the actual DU rules.
johnp3907
(3,732 posts)5. Wrong place for your infantile post.
But you knew that.
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)6. Wonderful and well reasoned article!
I love that journalists are really getting out there and making the case for Hillary.
Thank you for sharing this piece. Bookmarking!