Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumLos Angeles Times Endorses HRC
By contrast, Clinton, for all her faults and they range from a penchant for secrecy to a willingness to modify her positions to suit the popular mood to a less-restrained view of the use of military force than we are entirely comfortable with is vastly better prepared than Sanders for the presidency. She has The Times endorsement in the June 7 California Democratic primary.
Clinton may seem inauthentic to some or to lack that drink-a-beer-with-me quality that voters often look for in a candidate. But she has a grasp of the complexities of government and policy that is unmatched by any of the other candidates who ran for president this year or by most candidates in most years. She is sober and thoughtful, in possession not just of the facts she needs to make her arguments but of a depth of experience that undergirds her decisions. These qualities are reassuring in juxtaposition to a primary opponent who does not offer, at the end of the day, a serious alternative and, and a likely opponent in the general election who is unprepared, unsuited for the job and dangerous
Compared to the intoxicating altruism of the Sanders campaign, Clintons candidacy might seem unexciting. But nominating a candidate for president is, or ought to be, serious business. As Obama himself likely would admit after almost eight years in the White House, there is more to being president than grand promises, whether they are about hope and change or a political revolution. We admire Bernie Sanders passion for progress and equality, but our endorsement goes to the candidate who is more likely to translate ideals into action.
Full endorsement:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/endorsements/la-ed-democratic-presidential-endorsement-20160426-story.html
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)in a general election since LBJ in 1964 in the campaign against Donald Trump.
Cha
(297,249 posts)Thank you, book.
livetohike
(22,144 posts)pointed out the same qualities of Hillary and the same deficiencies of her opponents.
Koinos
(2,792 posts)Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)Sick sick sick of the "for all her faults" construct which seems to be exclusive to Hillary Clinton
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)She is human. Majority of her critics seem to discount that.
Apparently she must pass a purity test unlike those who need not, i.e. ALL OF THE GOPs comes to mind.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... is merely meant as a "courtesy" to those who genuinely feel that way. It's an unwritten but effective device that says "hold on, before you stop reading, hear us out".
It's aimed at the hardcore Bernie worshippers who instinctively reject anything that puts Hillary in a positive light. It's a diplomatic way to acknowledge someone's feelings without having to bicker over the minutiae, or get distracted by refuting their laundry list of idiotic conspiracy theories.
Intellectually, it's absurd to say anything that validates their "concerns" ... but diplomatically and strategically, it makes some sense.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)BootinUp
(47,154 posts)pandr32
(11,586 posts)"...our endorsement goes to the candidate who is more likely to translate ideals into action."
Boom!
Walk away
(9,494 posts)It's time for the real press to vet Bernie now that the "Media" has kicked him to the side.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)And very timely. Thanks book!