Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:23 AM May 2016

Los Angeles Times Endorses HRC

By contrast, Clinton, for all her faults — and they range from a penchant for secrecy to a willingness to modify her positions to suit the popular mood to a less-restrained view of the use of military force than we are entirely comfortable with — is vastly better prepared than Sanders for the presidency. She has The Times’ endorsement in the June 7 California Democratic primary.

Clinton may seem inauthentic to some or to lack that drink-a-beer-with-me quality that voters often look for in a candidate. But she has a grasp of the complexities of government and policy that is unmatched by any of the other candidates who ran for president this year — or by most candidates in most years. She is sober and thoughtful, in possession not just of the facts she needs to make her arguments but of a depth of experience that undergirds her decisions. These qualities are reassuring in juxtaposition to a primary opponent who does not offer, at the end of the day, a serious alternative and, and a likely opponent in the general election who is unprepared, unsuited for the job and dangerous

Compared to the intoxicating altruism of the Sanders’ campaign, Clinton’s candidacy might seem unexciting. But nominating a candidate for president is, or ought to be, serious business. As Obama himself likely would admit after almost eight years in the White House, there is more to being president than grand promises, whether they are about “hope and change” or a political revolution. We admire Bernie Sanders’ passion for progress and equality, but our endorsement goes to the candidate who is more likely to translate ideals into action.

Full endorsement:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/endorsements/la-ed-democratic-presidential-endorsement-20160426-story.html

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
2. My guess is that in terms of newspaper endorsments HRC will get more than any Democrat
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:29 AM
May 2016

in a general election since LBJ in 1964 in the campaign against Donald Trump.

Cha

(297,249 posts)
3. ".. but our endorsement goes to the candidate who is more likely to translate ideals into action.
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:29 AM
May 2016
"BS is not a serious alternative.."

Thank you, book.

livetohike

(22,144 posts)
4. Nice endorsement and nearly every newspaper endorsement has
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:30 AM
May 2016

pointed out the same qualities of Hillary and the same deficiencies of her opponents.

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts)
6. "For all her faults" let us go on here and describe a remarkably phenominal human being
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:44 AM
May 2016

Sick sick sick of the "for all her faults" construct which seems to be exclusive to Hillary Clinton

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
7. I agree, and I try to looks at it this way . . .
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:57 AM
May 2016

She is human. Majority of her critics seem to discount that.

Apparently she must pass a purity test unlike those who need not, i.e. ALL OF THE GOPs comes to mind.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
8. Yes ... but it's likely an intentional linguistic construction that ...
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:59 AM
May 2016

... is merely meant as a "courtesy" to those who genuinely feel that way. It's an unwritten but effective device that says "hold on, before you stop reading, hear us out".

It's aimed at the hardcore Bernie worshippers who instinctively reject anything that puts Hillary in a positive light. It's a diplomatic way to acknowledge someone's feelings without having to bicker over the minutiae, or get distracted by refuting their laundry list of idiotic conspiracy theories.

Intellectually, it's absurd to say anything that validates their "concerns" ... but diplomatically and strategically, it makes some sense.

pandr32

(11,586 posts)
10. Wonderful!
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:14 AM
May 2016

"...our endorsement goes to the candidate who is more likely to translate ideals into action."
Boom!

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
11. It's good that they called out Sander's simple minded approach to the country's problems!
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:20 AM
May 2016

It's time for the real press to vet Bernie now that the "Media" has kicked him to the side.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Los Angeles Times Endorse...