Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts) Tue Jul 19, 2016, 12:22 PM Jul 2016

Clinton has 945 electoral paths to the White House. Trump has 72.

https://mobile.twitter.com/aliciaparlap/status/755433237997031424

Clinton has 945 electoral paths to the White House. Trump has 72. @UpshotNYT

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html …

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton has 945 electoral paths to the White House. Trump has 72. (Original Post) misterhighwasted Jul 2016 OP

72 is too many ladym55 Jul 2016 #1

thank you for this, mister! Cha Jul 2016 #2

This is also relying on PA actually being a Swing state and... SaschaHM Jul 2016 #3

We need to assist in GOTV to block off as many paths for Trump. Thinkingabout Jul 2016 #4

ladym55

(2,577 posts)

1. 72 is too many

Reply to misterhighwasted (Original post)

Tue Jul 19, 2016, 05:17 PM

Jul 2016

Let's make that number even smaller (to match the candidate's hands).

Cha

(297,849 posts)

2. thank you for this, mister!

Reply to misterhighwasted (Original post)

Tue Jul 19, 2016, 06:23 PM

Jul 2016

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)

3. This is also relying on PA actually being a Swing state and...

Reply to misterhighwasted (Original post)

Tue Jul 19, 2016, 08:51 PM

Jul 2016

not a white whale like it has always been.
If PA stays Blue, Trump only has 8 ways to win.

If FL stays Blue like '08/'12, Trump only has 1 way to win.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

4. We need to assist in GOTV to block off as many paths for Trump.

Reply to misterhighwasted (Original post)

Tue Jul 19, 2016, 10:58 PM

Jul 2016

Reply to this discussion