Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton/Tammy Baldwin Op Ed about Wall Street's revolving door.
Both of us have a track record of supporting stronger ethics rules. One of us -- Tammy -- has introduced legislation in the Senate to help close that revolving door. The other of us -- Hillary -- strongly supports this bill, and as president would crack down on conflicts of interest in government.
Right now, some private sector employers offer bonuses to employees when they leave to join the government. This bill would prohibit that. The private sector shouldn't be allowed to "pay to play" with their former employees. If you're working for the government, you're working for the people -- not for an oil company, drug company, or Wall Street bank or money manager.
Right now, government employees entrusted with oversight are required by law to recuse themselves from any cases involving their former employers for one year. That's not long enough. This bill would bump it up to two years. And for people leaving government service, this bill would prevent them from taking a job at a company they oversaw until at least two years have passed.
Right now, loopholes allow former government officials to lobby in practice, even if they aren't officially called lobbyists. They offer regulatory access to private interests as "outside advisors" or "strategic counselors." That means they can avoid legal requirements that lobbyists have to meet. This bill would clamp down on that.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hillary-clinton/wall-street-revolving-door_b_8064504.html?1441031416
Botany
(70,516 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Botany
(70,516 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)I realize many of you folks look at it as a badge of honor to be blocked, however...
FWIW, having a hedge fund son-in-law has zero to do with the topic of this article.
postatomic
(1,771 posts)This took less than a minute.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)postatomic
(1,771 posts)It addresses many of the issues that currently protect Corporations.
Thanks for sharing this.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)I've never had much patience for ridiculous exchanges that pass for political "debate". Especially when facts are completely ignored. And I do mean completely.