Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:40 AM Jan 2016

HILLARY CLINTON GROUP President Obama On The Verge Of Issuing A “Citizens United Stunner”

Tue, Jan 26th, 2016
President Obama On The Verge Of Issuing A “Citizens United Stunner”


The President  is in the midst of very serious plan to issue an executive order that requires companies doing business with the federal government to disclose their political contributions. Just think; with a stroke of his pen the President will make “dark money” donors receiving billions of taxpayer money reveal who they contribute to or lose out on those highly-profitable federal government contracts.

Now, of course this does not, in any way, shape or form “overturn” Citizens United. But it is a major step in prompting some companies and corporations doing business with the federal government to rein in some of their dark money efforts to buy influence over the government. The directive, a so-called ‘dark money‘ executive order would mandate that “all government contractors publicly report their contributions to groups that spend money to influence campaigns and elections.”

SNIP

President Obama’s order would apply to roughly 70 percent of the Fortune 100 companies including Exxon Mobil, Apple, General Electric and General Motors to name but a fraction of the whole. The order will apply to any company with contracts exceeding $100,000 annually that probably will affect the preponderance of companies profiting from federal government contracts.

“While we will continue to examine ‘additional’ steps we can take to reduce the corrosive influence of money in politics, only Congress can put an end to it.

MORE..

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/01/26/president-obama-verge-pen-citizens-united-stunner.html

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HILLARY CLINTON GROUP President Obama On The Verge Of Issuing A “Citizens United Stunner” (Original Post) misterhighwasted Jan 2016 OP
Great President Obama! thank you, mister! Cha Jan 2016 #1
I do too!! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #2
Two Party System..Democrats & Kochs misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #3
Good Morning! Have a good day~ Cha Jan 2016 #6
He probably knows that he is never going to overturn Citizens United liberal N proud Jan 2016 #4
This is why everyone must vote Straight Ticket Dem misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #5
He is doing what is allowed as President. But.. misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #9
What prevents a company donating millions to dark money groups from saying that they donated zero? Lucky Luciano Jan 2016 #7
Get caught and get banned greymattermom Jan 2016 #8
Yes. Tha is it. misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #10
Don't get caught. Is there a real mechanism to try to catch cheaters? Lucky Luciano Jan 2016 #11
Whistleblowers, accounting firms. lostnfound Jan 2016 #16
Need a new government audit group cpamomfromtexas Jan 2016 #18
Can't wait for this! pandr32 Jan 2016 #12
This EO sounds good watoos Jan 2016 #13
This should have consequences for many lobbyist... RR2 Jan 2016 #14
The Supreme Court's decision also supports this disclosure Justice Jan 2016 #15
Yes! TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2016 #17

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
3. Two Party System..Democrats & Kochs
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:52 AM
Jan 2016

Sure glad our great President Obama wasn't Primaried

Morning Cha.
Gotta head out for an hour..brb

liberal N proud

(60,344 posts)
4. He probably knows that he is never going to overturn Citizens United
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:53 AM
Jan 2016

SCOTUS gave it their blessing on it and that will make it difficult to overturn, so everything that makes it visible what Citizens United is doing, is a good thing.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
5. This is why everyone must vote Straight Ticket Dem
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:04 AM
Jan 2016

And mid-term election is as critical to show up & VOTE.

Because without the Senate & House in our favor, no President will be able to make anything happen.

Obama is an exceptional man. He's also a Constitutional Lawyer..he knows his power.

Sure am proud of our Dem Candidate Clinton, who has campaigned & raised funds to get her fellow Dems in office with her.

This is a battle & coattails matter in the end.
HRC 2016

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
9. He is doing what is allowed as President. But..
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:33 AM
Jan 2016

Oooh it's going to piss off the Pukes.

So does Paul Singer's RW PAC have to disclose the money spent on their pro-Bernie TV AD against HRC?

Or if any $$$ has been shoveled into that "Charitable Offshore Fund".


Guess he'd need to be a Fed Contractor for that to happen.

Time to elect HRC & put an end to the Koch influence.
Hillary can then Nominate Barack Obama for Supreme Court.

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
7. What prevents a company donating millions to dark money groups from saying that they donated zero?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:15 AM
Jan 2016

How would it be known if they don't __really__ have to report it?

Good on Obama though - nice first step.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
10. Yes. Tha is it.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:38 AM
Jan 2016

Pres Obama can only operate from the Federal level.
Federal Contractors cannot influence politics, to garner themselves more Fed Contracts. Thats the gist of this executive order

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
11. Don't get caught. Is there a real mechanism to try to catch cheaters?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jan 2016

It seems the business models if large multinationals is based on the don't get caught mantra.

lostnfound

(16,189 posts)
16. Whistleblowers, accounting firms.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jan 2016

He could possibly require that companies doing business with the federal government get their accounting firms to verify / sign off on the statements.

This is a wonderful idea, although it won't address the mandatory "bundling" that goes on in executive suites. It would be tougher to require companies to disclose the political contributions of executives as individuals to the PACs.

pandr32

(11,610 posts)
12. Can't wait for this!
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jan 2016

It is bound to suck some air out of the clown car coverage for a bit. Pundits will all be talking about it.

RR2

(87 posts)
14. This should have consequences for many lobbyist...
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jan 2016

Think groups like the NRA who are backed back by weapons manufacturers, who also do business with the government.

Justice

(7,188 posts)
15. The Supreme Court's decision also supports this disclosure
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jan 2016


"The Government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether."




See decision at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/08-205.html#sthash.3X3WvbbF.dpuf

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
17. Yes!
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jan 2016

As MUCH as I hate the CU ruling, I'm wary of executive orders.

However, this move by President Obama is just brilliant! If it involves government contracts, surely he has every right and reason to do this!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»HILLARY CLINTON GROUP Pr...