Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumVoter disenfranchisement in ID and UT by not allowing absentee voting. How many elderly, disabled,
Poor without reliable transportation, workers who couldn't get time of to caucus, how many of the were denied their right to vote?
How come no one is yelling about this voters (including Sanders) being disenfranchised?
LisaM
(27,820 posts)People who have kids with disabilities.....the list goes on. Caucuses disenfranchise.
spooky3
(34,464 posts)They don't have time to caucus OR stand in line for hours.
brer cat
(24,590 posts)if they might vote for Bernie, else they are just out-of-luck losers. Just like red states don't count if they vote for Hillary but predict the second coming when they vote for Bernie. See, it really is simple if you just follow the BU rules.
Cha
(297,486 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)would hope this would change and to do away with caucuses. It does prevent lots of Hillary supporters and older voters votes in greater percentages.
SunSeeker
(51,630 posts)As interesting as politics are to me, no way could/would I attend a caucus. How much more true would this be of people who are more indifferent to politics?
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)I was able to vote anytime during the day, and it was well publicized. This time I found out about it last minute and was one of the last to vote.
I really did feel like it was a bad change to keep people away. Regardless, there was still massive turnout on all sides except for Trump.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)and love them now. Caucuses are the only opportunity he has to run up high number. If Idaho and Utah would have been primaries the results would have been different.
otohara
(24,135 posts)I'm working on a change.org petition for the Dems in my state to go back to primary.
BainsBane
(53,041 posts)Yet I keep hearing how it's not a problem there. http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511564107