Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:53 PM Mar 2016

Voter disenfranchisement in ID and UT by not allowing absentee voting. How many elderly, disabled,

Poor without reliable transportation, workers who couldn't get time of to caucus, how many of the were denied their right to vote?

How come no one is yelling about this voters (including Sanders) being disenfranchised?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voter disenfranchisement in ID and UT by not allowing absentee voting. How many elderly, disabled, (Original Post) lunamagica Mar 2016 OP
Nurses, bus drivers, home caregivers.... LisaM Mar 2016 #1
And professionals with 50+ hour workweeks spooky3 Mar 2016 #10
Voters are only disenfranchised brer cat Mar 2016 #2
Exactly.. do they care about that? Cha Mar 2016 #3
Caucuses does limit the participation of disabled persons, as some say it is voter suppression, I Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #4
It disenfranchises people with JOBS. nt SunSeeker Mar 2016 #5
+1000 spooky3 Mar 2016 #11
Exactly! Lucinda Mar 2016 #6
Last primary against Mitt was much easier here Hydra Mar 2016 #7
They hate Caucuses after Iowa Trenzalore Mar 2016 #8
Caucuses Suck - Disenfranchising - Chaotic otohara Mar 2016 #9
And a mile long line in UT BainsBane Mar 2016 #12

LisaM

(27,820 posts)
1. Nurses, bus drivers, home caregivers....
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:59 PM
Mar 2016

People who have kids with disabilities.....the list goes on. Caucuses disenfranchise.

spooky3

(34,464 posts)
10. And professionals with 50+ hour workweeks
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:45 PM
Mar 2016

They don't have time to caucus OR stand in line for hours.

brer cat

(24,590 posts)
2. Voters are only disenfranchised
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:59 PM
Mar 2016

if they might vote for Bernie, else they are just out-of-luck losers. Just like red states don't count if they vote for Hillary but predict the second coming when they vote for Bernie. See, it really is simple if you just follow the BU rules.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
4. Caucuses does limit the participation of disabled persons, as some say it is voter suppression, I
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:13 PM
Mar 2016

would hope this would change and to do away with caucuses. It does prevent lots of Hillary supporters and older voters votes in greater percentages.

spooky3

(34,464 posts)
11. +1000
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:47 PM
Mar 2016

As interesting as politics are to me, no way could/would I attend a caucus. How much more true would this be of people who are more indifferent to politics?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
7. Last primary against Mitt was much easier here
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:51 PM
Mar 2016

I was able to vote anytime during the day, and it was well publicized. This time I found out about it last minute and was one of the last to vote.

I really did feel like it was a bad change to keep people away. Regardless, there was still massive turnout on all sides except for Trump.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
8. They hate Caucuses after Iowa
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:56 PM
Mar 2016

and love them now. Caucuses are the only opportunity he has to run up high number. If Idaho and Utah would have been primaries the results would have been different.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
9. Caucuses Suck - Disenfranchising - Chaotic
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:29 PM
Mar 2016

I'm working on a change.org petition for the Dems in my state to go back to primary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Voter disenfranchisement ...