Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumCalifornia Field Poll: HRC: 47% BS: 41%
(Yep, California is an open primary):
In California, Clinton leads Sanders 47 percent to 41 percent (previous poll had HRC up 46-35) She and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have forged an expansive network of donors and political connections over a quarter-century campaigning in the state, and she remains the choice of women, older voters and registered Democrats here.
But Sanders, the senator from Vermont, is pummeling Clinton by 25 percentage points among likely voters in their 30s, and by an even wider margin among younger voters, according to the poll.
Sanders leads Clinton by 10 percentage points among independent voters likely to vote in the Democratic primary.
While more than 60 percent of Clinton supporters view Sanders favorably, according to the poll, Sanders supporters offer an assessment of Clinton that is more mixed and more negative than in January.
Hes doing damage, DiCamillo said. His campaign isnt being a kid glove campaign on Hillary any more. Its actually doing damage and is changing peoples minds about Hillary.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/presidential-election/article70613117.html
Some stats:
Dems favor Hillary 50-39
Indies favor Bernie 49-39
Men favor Bernie 48-40
Women favor Hillary 53-36
African-Americans favor Hillary 64-25
Latinos favor Hillary 49-42
White voters favor Hillary 45-43
LA County favors HRC 51-41
Other Southern California are split 44-44
San Francisco Bay/Northern Coast favor Hillary 49-46
Central Valley favors Hillary 45-30
dubyadiprecession
(5,722 posts)That sounds about right. After all her opponent is BS.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2016USDem
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Too many self-righteous "liberals" in that part of the State. Hillary will do just fine in CA and capture the lion's share of delegates. The biggest unions in our State support her; the most influential Democrats support her. She'll do fine. Just wished that the CA Democratic Party had opted for a closed primary like the CA Republican Party had - an option that the State's Party can choose every election.
Cha
(297,692 posts)I know.. California could be scary with the semi-closed primary.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)has the upper-hand here, with strong unions backing her. My union, the SEIU, endorsed her, and they're the most active of all unions. She's endorsed by just about all Democratic U.S. Reps, both of our U.S. Senators, and the lion's share of Democratic members of our CA Assemblymen and women and State Senators.
She won California in 2008 over Barack Obama.
Hillary Rodham Clinton: 2,608,184 and 51.5%
Barack Obama: 2,186,662 and 43.2%
We love the Clintons here. They did so much for California during the Clinton Administration.
Cha
(297,692 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)is set to vote for Hillary, as well. We're set to come together in the beginning of May when our absentee ballots come in, and then we'll sit around the patio tables (on different days since I can only accommodate twelve at a time), have something to eat, and vote.
Cha
(297,692 posts)How patriotic~
Well we know "85% of California Dems" want to continue President Obama's policies".. so I'm thinking that will help Hillary.
Hill supporters and surrogates need to swarm your state, BlueCali.. 'cause we know BS will be outspending her again~
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Party big-hitters need to come in and work hard for Hillary Clinton so that she gets the lion's share of those 546 delegates!
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)another Democrat in the White House for another eight years! I'm so excited!
Mahalo, Cha. I like those gifs, too.
Native
(5,943 posts)I imagine that if it were taken after Sander's comment that Hillary is unqualified to be POTUS, we'd see higher numbers for Hillary.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Californians aren't not pro-gun like the people of Vermont - especially just after the San Bernardino massacre in December last year (of which my son was a witness to the final shoot-out - you can read about that in my journal).
The wounds of that massacre are still open and raw, and his past votes to protect the gun lobby and to shield gun manufacturers, gun distributors, and gun sellers will be in each and every political mailing, for certain.
I believe, based on that alone, Bernie will lose CA by a wider margin than then Senator Obama (lost to Hillary 43.2% < 51.5%) who was strongly for gun safety laws, just like Hillary Clinton.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)The nomination will be decided before we get to CA by the string of closed primaries, beginning with NY.
Wish it were different as I live in CA, but we never have much of a say in the D nominating process.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Unfortunately, this time around, we're dead last. But then again, there are 546 delegates to win as opposed to the 441 (370 pledged and 71 unpledged delegates) from 2008.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)It was a close call between him and Hillary, but I think he was the right choice for the time, just like Hillary is the right choice for this time.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)supporting Edwards until his love-child came out in the last minute! I had to study up on President Obama's background real quick since I lead our small group of 41 voters and they rely on me to find the answers to their pretty spirited questions!
So we had a little over a month to get to know Senator Obama but, in the end, he passed with flying colors and got our votes!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)10 point win would get him 45 delegates. Anyone think he'll be that close going in?
Buelller? Bueller?