Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:01 PM Jul 2013

Denial of Airspace to Bolivian Leader Resonates at U.N.

Denial of Airspace to Bolivian Leader Resonates at U.N.
Published on July 11th, 2013
Written by: Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS, Jul 11 2013 (IPS) – The growing political uproar over the unlawful denial of European airspace for a jet carrying Bolivian President Evo Morales has spilled over into the United Nations.

The 120-member Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), the largest single political grouping in the world body, has expressed its “deep concern over the flagrant violation of the diplomatic immunity” of a sitting head of state.

“This serious incident put at risk the life of the Head of State of a sovereign developing country and the entourage that accompanied him by forcing the official airplane that carried him to make an emergency landing in Austria,” said the NAM statement.

“The Heads of State and their airplanes enjoy full immunity in accordance with international law,” the group asserted.

On Tuesday, a delegation of ambassadors from Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Venezuela met with Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to register a formal protest over the violation of diplomatic immunity. The meeting was followed by widespread speculation that the issue may surface at the Human Rights Council in Geneva, and possibly before the 193-member General Assembly in New York.

More:
http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/07/denial-of-airspace-to-bolivian-leader-resonates-at-u-n/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. Yada yada yada, Snowden has violated laws in the US, since this group is talking about possible
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:07 PM
Jul 2013

violations by whatever countries then the Snowden backers should get Snowden to turn himself in to the US.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. Because Snowden violated US laws, the US can violate international laws to get him?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:10 PM
Jul 2013

Is that the gist of your post?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
5. I am still not clear on your position. It's okay for the US to violate international law to
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:47 PM
Jul 2013

try to catch a US citizen charged with a crime?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
8. That's not the question.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:03 PM
Jul 2013

I'll play, anyway.

Sure. He is charged with breaking the law. It seems he did violate laws, and he is justifiable labeled a fugitive. Now, your turn. Is it okay for the US to violate international law in pursuit of someone charged with violating the law?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
12. I have not seen any evidence US has violated international laws, I have read posts on this site
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:40 PM
Jul 2013

where some posters has accused the US of violating international laws but there is no concrete proof.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
15. I am asking what you think the US can or should do in a situation.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 10:01 PM
Jul 2013

You seem to have implied that if the US is going after a fugitive, it is appropriate violate international law in their pusuit.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
6. I'm waiting for the Ministry of Truthiness to stop by
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 06:54 PM
Jul 2013

And tell us how this is all a misunderstanding and Morales is lying and not-white.

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
9. Oh, of course he's lying. After all, just look at him.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:07 PM
Jul 2013

He's not the Teabagger type, after all.

Do "skin color" Bandaids match his skin, like the John Kerry Purple Heart Bandaids matched the skin of Republicans at their National Convention?

[center][/center]

 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
16. Personally,
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jul 2013

I think all of Latin America should expel all US embassy officials until there is an admission of guilt and an apology. thanks for this post.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Denial of Airspace to Bol...