Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 07:19 PM Sep 2016

14,000-year-old campsite in Argentina adds to an archaeological mystery

14,000-year-old campsite in Argentina adds to an archaeological mystery

A glimpse of the last people on Earth to colonize a continent without humans.

Annalee Newitz - 9/28/2016, 2:58 PM

For more than a decade, evidence has been piling up that humans colonized the Americas thousands of years before the Clovis people. The Clovis, who are the early ancestors of today's Native Americans, left abundant evidence of their lives behind in the form of tools and graves. But the mysterious pre-Clovis humans, who likely arrived 17,000 to 15,000 years ago, have left only a few dozen sources of evidence for their existence across the Americas, mostly at campsites where they processed animals during hunting trips. Now a fresh examination of one such campsite, a 14,000-year-old hunter's rest stop outside the city of Tres Arroyos in Argentina, has given us a new understanding of how the pre-Clovis people might have lived.

Archaeologists are still uncertain how the pre-Clovis people arrived in the Americas. They came after the end of the ice age but at a time when glaciers and an icy, barren environment would still have blocked easy entrance into the Americas via Northern Canada. So it's extremely unlikely that they marched over a land bridge and into the Americas through the middle of the continent—most scientists believe they would have come via a coastal route, frequently using boats for transport. That would explain why many pre-Clovis sites are on the coast, on islands, or on rivers that meet the ocean.

These early settlers were hunter-gatherers who used stone tools for a wide range of activities, including hunting, butchery, scraping hides, preparing food, and making other tools out of bone and wood. Many of the pre-Clovis stone tools look fairly simple and were made by using one stone to flake pieces off the other, thus creating sharp edges. At the campsite in Argentina, known as the Arroyo Seco 2 site, archaeologists have found more than 50 such tools made from materials like chert and quartzite. They're scattered across an area that was once a grassy knoll above a deep lake, which is rich with thousands of animal bone fragments that have been carbon dated to as early as 14,000 years ago. There are even a couple-dozen human burials at the site, dated to a later period starting roughly 9,000 years ago. The spot has the characteristic look of a hunter's camp, used for processing animals, that was revisited seasonally for thousands of years.

Writing in PLoS One, the researchers describe a number of reasons why they believe a bunch of sharp-edged rocks and broken animal bones point to a 14,000-year-old human occupation of Argentina. First of all, there are far too many animal bones from a diversity of species grouped in one place for it to be accidental. Yes, there are some natural traps where we find massive numbers of prehistoric bones, but those are almost always in holes or depressions in the ground—and this area was on a rather high hill during the Pleistocene. Second, the stones aren't just sharp-edged in a way that suggests flaking; many also show signs of wear and tear from scraping hide. "A large majority of the flaked edges were used transversely on dry skin," the researchers write. "Consequently, it is likely that the skins were brought to the site in a state of intermediate processing." Also, most of the stone used for the tools, including quartzite and chert, can only be found over 110km from Arroyo Seco. So that piece of evidence also points to human hunter-gatherers carrying tools with them over great distances.

More:
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/14000-year-old-campsite-in-argentina-adds-to-an-archaeological-mystery/

Anthropology:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12292865

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
14,000-year-old campsite in Argentina adds to an archaeological mystery (Original Post) Judi Lynn Sep 2016 OP
Nice post. Annoying moving gif in the trailer. ColemanMaskell Sep 2016 #1
Interesting! I used to feel the same way when other DU'ers posted it, until someone pitched a fit Judi Lynn Sep 2016 #3
A large problem in finding the pre Clovis people Warpy Sep 2016 #2
Did humans conquer the Americas earlier than we thought? Bones and tools suggest we reached the tip Judi Lynn Sep 2016 #4

ColemanMaskell

(783 posts)
1. Nice post. Annoying moving gif in the trailer.
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 08:32 PM
Sep 2016

annoying gif or whatever it is. The thing that looks like a gnat attracted to the computer screen. It's annoying. A lot of people seem to have annoying trailers, but yours is the worst. A lot of people have moving pictures, most of which are annoying, but none come close to yours. When something moves like that, it draws the eye away from the text. When something takes up a lot of space, it reduces the amount of screen space left for text that can be seen in one glance. Large moving pictures in a post function in exactly the same way as advertisements and commercials, except that they don't generate revenue for anyone.

Good story, though.

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
3. Interesting! I used to feel the same way when other DU'ers posted it, until someone pitched a fit
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 11:47 PM
Sep 2016

Last edited Thu Sep 29, 2016, 05:53 AM - Edit history (1)

about it, ran down the poster. Quite a few other posters started using it, also, and I decided I so much disliked the way the attacker made a point of trying to attack someone, that I jumped on board.

As soon as I had it attached to my posts, I actually stopped noticing it. Who could have predicted that?

Thank you.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
2. A large problem in finding the pre Clovis people
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 08:56 PM
Sep 2016

is that the coastline isn't where it used to be in too much of the Americas. The people who got here by island hopping most likely did cling to the coasts and to river estuaries where fish, game and plant life were plentiful. Most of what they left behind is covered by hundreds of feet of water.

I'm not a bit surprised they found a campsite dated to far earlier than the land bridge theory would allow for. I'm only a little surprised that it was far enough inland to survive the sea level rise at the end of the last ice age.

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
4. Did humans conquer the Americas earlier than we thought? Bones and tools suggest we reached the tip
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 06:20 AM
Sep 2016

Did humans conquer the Americas earlier than we thought? Bones and tools suggest we reached the tip of South America 14,000 years ago

  • Researchers excavated an archaeological site in southern Argentina
  • They found artefacts dating back to between 14,064 and 13,068 years ago
  • The findings included animal bones from extinct species and small tools
  • This suggests humans were living in the Southern Cone at this time

    By Abigail Beall For Mailonline

    Published: 13:01 EST, 28 September 2016 | Updated: 02:43 EST, 29 September 2016



    The original Americans came from Siberia in a single wave no more than 23,000 years ago, at the height of the last Ice Age.

    They travelled across a land bridge connecting Asia to North America, arriving around 16,000 years ago, before making their way south.

    Now a new study shows Homo sapiens reached the southern cone of the Americas 14,000 years ago - in a find which could put a date on the final step in our colonization of the continent.

    The researchers, led by Dr Gustavo Politis from the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (Conicet) in Argentina, studied an archaeological site called Arroyo Seco 2.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3812063/Did-humans-conquer-Americas-earlier-thought-Bones-tools-suggest-reached-tip-South-America-14-000-years-ago.html#ixzz4LdfDdKcx

    There's so much more to be discovered. One has to wonder if the truth about human life in the Americas will in any way resemble what is believed currently.
  • Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»14,000-year-old campsite ...