Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,539 posts)
Fri Jul 19, 2019, 02:54 AM Jul 2019

Navy brass, low budget blamed for Argentina sub tragedy


BY DÉBORA REY ASSOCIATED PRESS
JULY 18, 2019 06:00 PM, UPDATED 5 HOURS 47 MINUTES AGO
BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA

An Argentine legislative commission has concluded that the sinking of a submarine with all 44 crewmembers was caused by the inefficiency of naval commanders and budget limitations, discarding theories the vessel was attacked or hit by a ship.

In a report released Thursday, the legislators also questioned the handling of the crisis by Defense Minister Oscar Aguad and President Mauricio Macri, who the commission said showed a "low level of involvement with everything related to the tragedy."

The ARA San Juan disappeared on Nov. 15, 2017, in the South Atlantic as it sailed back to its base at the port of Mar del Plata after participating in a training exercise. The wreckage wasn't found until almost a year later at a depth of 800 meters (2,625 feet) east of Patagonia's Valdes Peninsula. The discovery was made by a ship from the U.S. company Ocean Infinity, which had been hired to search.

"The hypotheses that the submarine was attacked by a foreign warship, hit by a fishing vessel or was performing secret tasks outside of jurisdictional waters have been discarded," said the commission, which was made up of lawmakers from different parties, including the governing party.

More:
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/business/article232865437.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

EX500rider

(10,848 posts)
1. Yeah judging by the bottom growth in this shot she did not get much upkeep:
Fri Jul 19, 2019, 02:09 PM
Jul 2019

She was 34 years old also, requiring more upkeep the a newer boat. Heck the Taiwanese have a old WWII US sub still in service.

ARA San Juan:



They had a battery fire the day before the sinking, it is too bad they did not adjust their course a little to the left to stay in shallow water, they may have survived for some time a sinking there.

She went down right at the edge of the continental shelve:



Judi Lynn

(160,539 posts)
2. The submarine photo even looks dangerous to people who know nothing about submarines.
Fri Jul 19, 2019, 04:34 PM
Jul 2019

Surely everyone commissioned to serve on it felt sick the minute they saw it.

EX500rider

(10,848 posts)
3. I've never even seen a submarine with bottom growth like that (or any for that matter)....
Fri Jul 19, 2019, 06:52 PM
Jul 2019

....that's a lot for even a surface ship and I would blanch at being told we were going to submerge in her for sure.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Navy brass, low budget bl...