Is hating men THIS MUCH healthy?
http://radfemcentral.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/the-power-of-female-rage/This blog is true hate speech and the transphobia and naked hatred of them is shocking. Is hatred of men the real issue behind this or is it something else?
For all the accusation of woman-hating, do you think there are men that fly off the handle this much against woman who become men like Chastity Bono?
--------------------------------------------------
Yesterday Janet Mock of People Magazine, (he of “Girls Like Us” fame), decided to start a campaign against my blog. Early Friday morning (before my Suzanne Moore Tweet post) I became aware of a censorship campaign against GenderTrender, and all wordpress radical feminist blogs. There have been a million of these campaigns, but Mock is a very powerful man.
Mock initially became enraged when he read my post (Number 4 above) and saw a photo of himself, and “misgendering” (because it mentioned that he was male) and decided that women have no right to discuss or post photos of public figures on feminist blogs. Instead of filing a complaint with wordpress or messaging me with his demands (or just shutting the fuck up) he started a twitter campaign to ban my blog which was quickly seized by trans activists smelling blood in the water following their successful censorship of Burchill and success in driving Suzanne Moore off of twitter. All the usual suspects came on board within minutes: Hetero female “fag” Stephen Ira, Lefty “TGirl” inventor of the ladystick Savanna Garmon, Transfeminist Natalie “Die cis scum” Reed and all the rest. NO DISCUSSION of TRANS ACTIVISM by WOMEN they railed. GAG THESE BITCHES.
This is the picture Gay Male Janet Mock complained about
When I did not notice Mock’s campaign (because I never check my tweets and I was sleeping) he engaged his pals to post news articles complaining about wordpress.com’s hosting of gender critical and trans-critical blogs. The proposed banning of all female voices re: politics relating to gender, especially mine. I took action when I became aware of Mock’s campaign, specifically his charge that the public news-site photo I had used was off limits. To placate his male rage I replaced that pic with an alternate screen cap from another (NBC) appearance, and I kindly tweeted him that I had resolved his photo issue. Seriously, these guys literally think they can lobby on the national news and women have no right to discuss it. HOW DARE IT SPEAK???
= new reply since forum marked as read
One of the other folks at "radfemhub" blogged about how she's in child care, and one of the "future rapists" she was watching, a 9 year old boy, kissed a girl on the cheek 
and as such she "wished she could throw him out the window to keep him from growing up".
Great, yes, really you should be watching children.
because that's so out-of line disturbing that it gave me brain freeze, and to be somewhat fair to the psycho caregiver, the little boy didn't just kiss the girl on the cheek. He backed her into a corner with two other children and demanded that she kiss him, and then some time later told her "If you don't love me back and be my girlfriend, I'll just rape you".
That would freak anyone out a bit. BUT:
Lo these many years ago, believe it or not, I did child care for a while. A short while, until I learned how much I didn't like children (and believe me, that's something you learn very quickly working in a day care). And my take on it is this: you have witnessed a 9 year old child in your care acting out sexually bullying on two different occasions. Your job, at this point, is to take that child aside and have a little discussion about the word "rape" in your best non-threatening talking-to-a-9-year-old voice, including questions like what he feels is meant by that word and where he learned that word. And then you go and have a chat with your contact at Child Protective Services; because acting out is called "acting out" for a reason, when children of nine act out in a sexualized manner it's a great big red flag for something rotten happening on the home front, and you are a fucking mandatory reporter and this is a child in your care. It's your job, by law, to find out what the hell is going on with that kid, yes, even if he has a penis and used a bad word. That's why you're called a caregiver.
Here's what you don't do: you don't hail things like "I'd have threatened to cut his pecker off" or "I'd have thrown him out the window" as being wonderfully supportive advice from your sisters in spirit, because once you do that, you fail utterly at child nurturing. What the little boy said was disturbing, but his caregiver completely fucked up her reaction to it and has no business caring for children. I really loathe kids, but even I would have bridled at "support" like that, no matter how upset I was. She needs to find a new line of work, far away from any young children, and I sincerely hope she gets help before she decides to have her own.
Argh. Fail.
I'll butt back out of your group now.
and if one goes looking for it, a lot of the folks making noise about it are dubious sources in their own right, for obvious reasons.
Bottom line is, though, some atrocious shit has been said on the "radfemhub" board. That much is apparent.
Thanks, again, for the clarification.
If you look at where this particular sliver of "movement" is popular, you have folks in bumblefuck Australia talking to folks in England, mostly. There may be one or two in the US, but it's hardly anything resembling a groundswell, much less one that even has the remotest hint of traction. Honestly, I wouldn't have heard of any of it- or the equally inane MRA crazies on the other side- were it not for DU.
When I think False flag I think of the folks at the Iraq War rallies who made a point of lighting garbage cans on fire in front of the news cameras. 99% of the time I think radfem hub is the same 5 people (and their socks, of course- "hello my sisters!" 
) talking to themselves. Not much of a false flag.
talking to themselves.
When they got kicked out of Conway Hall they brought in Dines and Jeffreys to do "Keynote" speeches in front of a crowd that was, maybe, 10 people.
A big turnout by Glenn Beck/Teabag standards, maybe.
Worldwide audience maybe meaning one person in the Australian Outback, one in Texas, and one in Liverpool. 
I just think that you have a dwindling group of aging people who are perpetually frustrated that their tautological, axiomatic, gibberish-laden bullshit- which to them makes PERFECT sense- never really caught on. Sort of like how those Stalinist group meetings are getting pretty lonely, along with the Esperanto Speakers' Clubs. (Telling 7 Billion People that the way most of them like to have sex is WRONG WRONG WRONG? Hmmm, who could have thought that notion wouldn't sell like hotcakes?) Like the whiny MRA people; these folks would be unhappy anyway~ so now they have the internet so they can talk to other, similarly unhappy people. As far as making new converts? Doubtful.
