Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forumWhen someone "reminds" me that Ford didn't get a bailout ... should I remind them that
it was only because Ford got a loan (hmm ... they had to borrow money? Someone keeps saying "if you can't afford it, don't buy it" right before the banks dried up?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2397 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When someone "reminds" me that Ford didn't get a bailout ... should I remind them that (Original Post)
zbdent
May 2013
OP
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)1. What business doesn't borrow money?
It's known as leverage. You borrow to develop and pay back when the product sells.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)4. Alan Mulally made all the difference though.
The Economist wrote a nice article on the topic. Money quote:
By 2006 the situation had become so bleak that Mr Ford and Don LeClair, then his finance director, decided to undertake a dramatic refinancing of the business by raising bank loans secured against the company's assets. This they saw as the only hope of financing a turnaround in Ford's core North American business (Europe, at least, was already improving). But because the Big Three had unveiled umpteen unfulfilled turnaround plans over the years, Mr Ford needed to give this latest effort credibility, especially with the company's bankers. To do that he began a search for his own replacement as chief executive (he remains chairman). Eventually he looked outside the motor industry. Which is how Mr Mulally's phone at Boeing came to ring.
They were actually in worse shape than GM. They have done a good job turning around the company, but they really were lucky in their timing. Another 12 months and they would have been at the public trough to.
http://www.economist.com/node/17673258
Scuba
(53,475 posts)3. Ford also benefited in that they didn't see all their providers to under.
The smaller shops that make parts for the Big 3 would have suffered without GM and Chrysler being bailed out.