Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:02 PM Feb 2012

Iceland upgrade sure makes default look palatable

by Edward Harrison, Credit Writedowns:

A friend commented to me when he saw the story that Iceland had been upgraded by Fitch, the ratings agency, that this "sure makes default look palatable". Obviously, Iceland is not out of the woods yet but their relative success says there are other ways to get it done.

The BBC reports:

Iceland is safe to invest in again, according to Fitch, which has upgraded its credit rating three years after its economy spectacularly collapsed.

Fitch raised Iceland’s sovereign rating by one notch, to BBB- from BB+, meaning that the country’s debt is now "investment grade".


(snip)

I think the January headline from the Irish Independent that Iceland fared better than us by letting its banks fail makes sense. The lesson from Iceland is most applicable to Ireland since its core problem was a banking crisis. Is it too late for Ireland on the bank debt front? Perhaps, but at a minimum, the Irish have been models of austerity, and to the degree they don’t meet their targets, they should be given a break via bank debt haircuts.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. They are far from being out of the woods
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:07 PM
Feb 2012

They were used to an unemployment rate of 3% which is now 8% , they would like to join the EU but can't until prior debts to the UK and Holland are cleared and they would like to be in the Euro too.

unblock

(52,241 posts)
2. it's a relatively good story, considering, but using it as an example for others may be a stretch
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:34 PM
Feb 2012

iceland is a tiny and isolated economy and 90% of its problems were literally 3 banks.
plus, it has its own currency, which is an advantage in this case as devaluation is a painful but quick solution.

it's not like other countries, where the inter-relationships are vast and complicated and the you can't just devalue the currency and the economy is much larger and many, many industries were had structural problems.

elleng

(130,917 posts)
4. Iceland's Financial Watchdog Sacks Director.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:39 PM
Feb 2012

Iceland's Financial Surveillance Authority (FME) said on Saturday it had sacked director Gunnar Andersen following a report into his time as an executive at failed bank Landsbanki.

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/02/18/business/18reuters-iceland-watchdog.html?hp

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
5. Default is preferable. Gamblers lose their paper. All the houses, buildings, cars, and schools that
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 07:29 PM
Feb 2012

were there before default are still standing the day after.

Risk has consequence. Gamblers need to learn that.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
6. If the ECB essentially subordinates Euro Debt and a new perception of sovereign debt emerges
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:04 PM
Feb 2012

The "gamblers" may just shut off the spigots. Then the funding ends. Is that really what the Europeans want?

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
7. I have had no dealings with banks since 1978. I'm better off financially than I could
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:52 PM
Feb 2012

have been otherwise.

The only reason we need banks is because they say so. The only spigot they have is the money we give them and allow to dole back to us for a fee. Crazy, really.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Iceland upgrade sure make...