Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 07:30 AM Mar 2015

Reich: The 'iEverything' and the Redistributional Imperative

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/03/17/ieverything-and-redistributional-imperative

It’s now possible to sell a new product to hundreds of millions of people without needing many, if any, workers to produce or distribute it. At its prime in 1988, Kodak, the iconic American photography company, had 145,000 employees. In 2012, Kodak filed for bankruptcy. The same year Kodak went under, Instagram, the world’s newest photo company, had 13 employees serving 30 million customers.

<snip>

Where will this end?

Imagine a small box – let’s call it an “iEverything” – capable of producing everything you could possibly desire, a modern day Aladdin’s lamp. You simply tell it what you want, and – presto – the object of your desire arrives at your feet. The iEverything also does whatever you want. It gives you a massage, fetches you your slippers, does your laundry and folds and irons it.

The iEverything will be the best machine ever invented.

The only problem is no one will be able to buy it. That’s because no one will have any means of earning money, since the iEverything will do it all.
This is obviously fanciful, but when more and more can be done by fewer and fewer people, the profits go to an ever-smaller circle of executives and owner-investors.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reich: The 'iEverything' and the Redistributional Imperative (Original Post) eridani Mar 2015 OP
And this is why the Larry Summerses stupidly wonder why people are not buying stuff. djean111 Mar 2015 #1
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. And this is why the Larry Summerses stupidly wonder why people are not buying stuff.
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 08:50 AM
Mar 2015

Pretty soon, the only way for the economy to lurch forward is to either have constant wars and/or have the 1% buy all the stuff and give it away or destroy it. Zero sum game, eventually.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Reich: The 'iEverything'...