Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:25 PM Jan 2012

Public unions: What's the big deal?


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mccartin-unions-20120117,0,2527319.story

For decades, collective bargaining for government workers wasn't controversial.


Jorge Cabrera, a graduate student at UC Santa Barbara and vice president of Uniting Academic Workers, rallies students and union members at UCLA to show support for government workers in Wisconsin trying to retain their collective bargaining rights. (Jay L. Clendenin / Los Angeles Times / March 2, 2011)


By Joseph A. McCartin

January 17, 2012

On Jan. 17, 1962, President Kennedy signed Executive Order 10988, bringing collective bargaining rights to most federal workers for the first time. Kennedy's order might be the least known of the string of significant events that made the 1960s such crucial years in American history. At the time Kennedy acted, very few workers at any level of government had won the right to bargain collectively with their employers. Federal action helped inspire many states and localities to follow suit, allowing their own workers to organize. This triggered a huge wave of unionization in the public sector that saw firefighters, teachers, sanitation workers, social workers and many others form unions in the 1960s and '70s.

For 20 years after Kennedy's order, public sector union rights were not controversial. To the contrary, they enjoyed bipartisan support — even from conservatism's leading light, Ronald Reagan. Reagan, as governor of California, presided over the extension of collective bargaining rights to state and local workers in 1968.

Over the course of the last 30 years, however, bipartisan support for public sector bargaining has eroded. And it was Reagan's breaking of the 1981 strike by PATCO, the union of air traffic controllers, that contributed to this shift. More recently, Gov. Scott Walker in 2011 cited that action as an inspiration for his effort to strip government workers of bargaining rights in Wisconsin. Yet in his day Reagan never went as far as Walker. In the PATCO case (and in other negotiations), he never challenged government workers' rights to bargain, only their right to strike illegally.

Lately, critics of public sector unions are fond of alleging that Kennedy's extension of union rights to government was a mistake. They claim that collective bargaining by government is responsible for today's budget deficits; that public sector unions, in league with allies in the Democratic Party, are lining the pockets of their members at taxpayers' expense.


FULL story at link.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Public unions: What's the big deal? (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jan 2012 OP
K & R ellisonz Jan 2012 #1
k&r Starry Messenger Jan 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Public unions: What's the...