Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

groovedaddy

(6,229 posts)
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:58 PM Dec 2012

Unionizing the Bottom of the Pay Scale

Other than poverty, José Carrillo and Joshua Williams have little in common. The austere life of Mr. Carrillo, a 79-year-old Peruvian immigrant from Washington Heights, is a universe apart from the hardscrabble reality of Mr. Williams, a 28-year-old single father from Atlanta staying at his aunt’s place in Brooklyn to save on rent.

But their lives are connected. They both work in the fast-food industry — Mr. Carrillo at a McDonald’s in Midtown Manhattan and Mr. Williams at a Wendy’s in Brooklyn. They both earn a little more than $7 an hour. And they both need food stamps to survive. Last Thursday, both did something they had never done before: they went on strike.

Their activism, part of a flash strike of some 200 workers from fast-food restaurants around New York City, caps a string of unorthodox actions sponsored by organized labor, including worker protests outside Walmart stores, which, like most fast-food chains, are opposed to being unionized, and union drives at carwashes in New York and Los Angeles.

Labor unions are hoping that the unusual tactics, often in collaboration with social justice activists and other community groups, will offer them a new opportunity to get back on the offensive, helping to raise the floor for wages and working conditions in the harsh, ultracompetitive economy of the 21st century.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/business/unionizing-at-the-low-end-of-the-pay-scale.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121205

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. I thought this paragraph sums it up rather well
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 06:18 AM
Dec 2012
Mr. Carrillo’s and Mr. Williams’s meager salaries also underscore the straightforward choice we face as a nation: either we build an economy in which most workers can earn enough to adequately support their families or we build a government with the wherewithal to subsidize the existence of a lower class that can’t survive on its own. We are doing neither.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. This should have been done long ago. I have had one job in my life that paid a real living wage and
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 12:43 PM
Dec 2012

that was as a temp. Instead I was the full time 24/7 care provider for my disabled daughter for 45 years working all these low pay part time jobs to supplement our income. Down here we have no one to speak for us.

However, I have also seen the problems of working with higher full time wage earners. Many times we have differing needs and that leads to conflict when the negotiations start.

Still I think this most be done so the Unions can regain their power base.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Unionizing the Bottom of ...