Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Labor News & Commentary September 26 Trump's DOL seeks to roll back a rule granting FLSA protections to domestic care...
https://onlabor.org/september-26-2025/
By Sophia Leswing
Sophia is a student at Harvard Law School. Prior to law school she was an organizer at SEIU 32BJ in New York City where she helped building service workers unionize. She is on the bargaining
In todays news and commentary, Trumps DOL seeks to roll back a rule granting FLSA protections to domestic care workers; the Second Circuit allows a claim of hostile work environment created by DEI trainings to proceed; and a GAO report finds alarming levels of sexual abuse in high school Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps programs.
The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor (DOL) has quietly been trying to roll back a 2013 DOL rule that granted more domestic care workers minimum wage and overtime provisions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Though in 1974 Congress amended the FLSA to include domestic service workers, it barred employees considered companions from minimum wage and overtime rules as well as live-in domestic care employees from overtime pay. In 1975, the DOL promulgated a rule that expanded the definition of companionship service and created an exemption for third-party agency workers such as workers from home care staffing agencies. In 2013, the DOL under Obama issued a rule that removed the third-party agency exemption and more narrowly defined companionship services so that more domestic care workers would receive FLSA protections. Now, Trumps DOL wants to restore the exclusions of the 1970s, which could have devastating consequences for the countrys 3.7 million home care workers.
Yesterday, in Chislett v. N.Y.C. Dept of Educ., the Second Circuit held that Leslie Chislett, a former Caucasian employee of the New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE), provided enough evidence such that a rational jury might find that mandatory implicit bias trainings created a hostile workplace environment. In October 2019, Chislett brought suit against the NYC DOE alleging employment discrimination based on her race, a hostile work environment caused by a municipal policy or custom, and constructive discharge. The Second Circuit affirmed the district courts grant of summary judgment in favor of NYC DOE as to Chisletts constructive discharge and demotion claims, and vacated as to Chisletts claim of hostile work environment.
Today, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on sexual misconduct by Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps (J.R.O.T.C.) instructors across the country. J.R.O.T.C. is a Department of Defense (DOD) program whose purpose is, in part, to instill in students the values of citizenship and provide[] a course of military instruction. The program operates in over 3,400 U.S. public high schools and in fiscal year 2024, it received $439 million in DOD funding. The GAO report found that about one in ten schools with J.R.O.T.C. programs did not have required sexual misconduct training for staff. Additionally, 2 to 7% of schools (or as many as 240 schools) with a J.R.O.T.C. program had at least one instructor accused of sexual misconduct in the last five years. The government report comes about three years after a bombshell New York Times investigation finding that dozens of schools made the J.R.O.T.C. program mandatory (even though the law requires that each student join the program voluntarily), and that 80% of schools where at least 75% of freshmen were enrolled in the J.R.O.T.C. program had a majority Black or Hispanic student body. The GAO report is especially distressing given that high school teachers have criticized the program since at least 2004.